User talk:Gsham

Welcome!

Hello Gsham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HollyAm 17:12, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

my user page

Dude, I hope you don't care that I comletely stole all your ideas and format for a user page and used them on mine. Oh well, feel free to leave me a message any time. Gatherton 17:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: dumbass

No, you see; your joke was funny 'cause it's cute. mine was funny 'cause it's true.

BKHS - Postgrad Matriculations

e massive list of postgraduate matriculations is inconsistent and haphazard. It doesn't list every matriculation or offer data on their relative popularity. Is it worth noting that one student went to a given school in the last couple of years? No. Moreover, it isn't the same style as other articles for private schools. Your obsessive tending of this article has got to stop. It is evident from the history of the article that other people want this change made. Roll with it

hey i don't think a list of just the superfantastic schools or whatever is a good idea. we ought to give a good description of where bishop kelley graduates matriculate, that being often to the state schools but also routinely to the top schools in the nation. excessive elaboration or unseemly focus on just the top schools is not appropriate.

RE: Block of 68.109.250.194

Done. I've reblocked the IP so only anons are blocked. Log in and you should be fine. -- Steel 10:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BishopKelley.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BishopKelley.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Everett.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Everett.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BKHS Comets.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BKHS Comets.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bishop Kelley Catholic School

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bishop Kelley Catholic School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bishop Kelley Catholic School

I have nominated Bishop Kelley Catholic School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Kelley Catholic School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Raven1977 (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]