User talk:Holoh

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. —porges_(talk) 05:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Zenswashbuckler. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Reproductive rights, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☯.Zen Swashbuckler.☠ 13:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is Holoh. Are you fucking serious you piece of shit? I need a link to show that abortion cannot be a part of "reproductive rights"? Do you cite the motherfucking dictionary for every word you post? No, because a grasp of the English language is a prerequisite for understanding things on the English version of Wikipedia. Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy - thus there can be no reproduction. No citation is needed to show that this is true. It is definitional. It is logic. I'm sorry that your personal bias precludes you from understanding this. Come at me bro. I'll fucking kill you.

Welcome!

Hello, Holoh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ☯.Zen Swashbuckler.☠ 14:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down.

Seriously. This is an encyclopedia, not an opinion forum or a goddamn boxing match. That means it's an attempt at summarizing all of human knowledge; this requires expertise and authority. The authority of any random person on the internet can be safely assumed to be zero; therefore we rely exclusively on published sources, especially for claims that say things like "The underpinnings of half this article are wrong." If your position is supported by logic, then someone will have noticed by now, and there'll be a scholarly source or ten to back you up. If there isn't, we have to assume you're just another yahoo blowing hot air into the ether. If you aren't, prove it. If you want to get something new on this page without it getting deleted, you can always ask for help on the article talk page, or the talk pages of some of the users listed here, here, here, or here. Good luck. ☯.Zen Swashbuckler.☠ 16:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zenswashbucker, SUCK. MY. DICK. - Sincerely, Holoh.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 06:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]