User talk:Infomed

Welcome!

Hello, Infomed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! J Milburn 22:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Charts

The articles you have shown me clearly show excellent coverage of the program, and so I have restored the article and moved it to your userspace- you can find it here- so that you can add those references to the article. Also, external links outside of a references or external links section are very much discouraged, as they make the article look very spammy, which is why I deleted it in the first place, on top of the notability concerns. Once you have updated the article a little, feel free to move it back to the namespace, or contact me, and I'll take a look at it for you. Thanks for contacting me. J Milburn 22:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Infomed/Amazing Charts EHR

User:Infomed/Amazing Charts EHR, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Infomed/Amazing Charts EHR and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Infomed/Amazing Charts EHR during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rd232 ^talk 02:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Bertman for deletion

The article Jonathan Bertman is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bertman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rd232 ^talk 02:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AfraidToAsk.com for deletion

The article AfraidToAsk.com is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfraidToAsk.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rd232 ^talk 02:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bertman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bertman. Since you had some involvement with the Bertman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Bertman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Bertman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bertman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJH2018 talk 17:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]