User talk:Islander/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 14

Finale -> final

Hi, as I said, it could be better worded. In UKEng, "finale" is Italian (or French) and borrowed from opera or theatre to mean the closing sequence; "final" is usually reserved for sporting events, as in "Soccer Cup Final", the last match of the competition and isn't used here for TV series. It's a rare case where UK/USA use the same word. Easily confused, I agree. Cheers. --Rodhullandemu _final" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">23:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I don't watch enough TV! I've never heard the ending of a TV series called a "final". I think it's fixable, however. "Ending"/"Closing story"? Meanwhile, I have to be up at 6am for my med, so I do need some sleep. Catch you later. --Rodhullandemu 23:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:JohnLewis.gif

Would you tag this as g7 Fasach Nua (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

I5 seems more appropriate here. _TalkIslander 11:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Lab Rats

Hello. Your removal of quotes from Lab Rats had the following edit summary:

"(Block quotes should be avoided, as NPOV is hard to maintain - 'reception' should, as with the rest of the article, be prose.)"

That's nonsensical and does not accord with any Wikipedia policies I'm aware of (please place a link my talk page over at Talk:Lab Rats if you know better).

As far as I'm aware blockquotes are to be used when substantive amounts of text are being quoted (that is, more than a phrase or sentence). The issue of NPOV doesn't arise since quotes from the media are a matter of referenced/recorded fact. No user (unless they are the journalist themselves) can create these quotes of their own free will.

In any case: since your argument is that they should be in a different format (ie, "be prose") that's not a reason for you to remove them, rather merely to reformat. On that basis I'm reverting your removal. --bodnotbod (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Top Gear

Are you willing to reach a negotiated settlement re: the Top Gear issues, or do we carry on with the fun and games? Please see the Top Gear discussion page for more details. SabineSchmitz (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: RTL open day

Hi! Thanks for your kind comments regarding the pictures I took at the Reading Transport open day. I probably did see you at one point but the wonders of the internet mean I don't know who you are! I thought it was a great day and a credit to everyone at Reading Buses. The highlight had to be the cavalcade at the end. I went to Reading town so they were a bit separated by then, but I still got a nod from James Freeman as he drove past in 1112 and I took a photo!! Arriva436^talk 16:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

HI

Hi do you know how to change your username on wikipedia? or is it not possible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack haywood (talk • contribs) 01:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Anyone? Anyone?

No problem, Islander. Have fun! Matthew (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh no - he's back...

Hi. I can understand if you want to keep out of this, but it appears Davesmith is back. Please see this diff. As another uninvolved editor reviewed the situation and banned all the related accounts, do you think this is grounds to ban this new one on the spot? Halsteadk (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Caught ;). And yep, as the sockpuppet case was closed against him, any further socks can indeed be blocked on sight, by any admin. _TalkIslander 16:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

BBC TV Centre

Thanks for your message. BECTU is the union for British broadcasting industry. The edits I made to the article on TVC referred to a section printed in the BECTU monthly newsletter. I have done what I can in the reference, not sure how to include any more information. Paul75 (talk) 15:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Reverting "Good Faith" edits

There are only three templates (one for Superman and two for Batman). How is three being "too much" for you!? What point is there to have Pinewood in the templates in the first place, if there's no where to place them afterwards? Besides, a majority of the Pinewood productions have seemed to have been in relation to the James Bond/EON films. TMC1982 (talk) 11:50 p.m., 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Pinewood has a tonne of productions, each of which could in theory have it's own template - it's just not sensible to have templates for these productions on the studio's page, because before long the page will be inundated with similar templates. By all means link to Pinewood in the template, but there is no need to place the template o nthe Pinewood page. Same goes for other studios. _TalkIslander 08:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Betacommand

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive146#Proposed community ban of Betacommand. -- Ned Scott 20:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/I have blocked Betacommand‎. --_TalkIslander 21:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

...and to expand, changes should not be made whilst this is being discussed without a clear consensus for said changes to be made. _TalkIslander 21:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

BBC One Idents

Notice Capes wasnt a bbc140 fake! ;) and watch tonight on BBC One at 9pm - New one dogs.

Speak soon,

bbc140 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.13.185 (talk) 18:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

David Bergeron

I was about to turn down the speedy deletion request for David Bergeron because it seems to me that "NFL linebacker with the Carolina Panthers" is a clear assertion of notability. The article could certainly user more info, but it's been around for three years and was tagged as part of two WikiProjects. I'd rather see it go through AFD rather than speedy deletion if you think he's not a notable. Can you please reconsider your speedy deletion?Thanks. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

The article does nothing to suggest why he's notable. "NFL linebacker with the Carolina Panthers" means nothing to me, and I can see you saying that this means that I personally shouldn't have deleted it, however, I disagree. If the article is notable, it should jump out to anyone, whether they know about the subject or not. I'll give the benefit of doubt here, but I still really feel that it does fail A7. _TalkIslander 20:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reconsidering. Please feel free to take it to AFD or propose deletion. Cheers, -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

John E. Pike/Temp deletion

I cut and pasted a copyrighted newsclipping posted on the subjects website (not his copyright) I then grouped the quotes by the subject, then grouped quotes about the subject, then began rewriting the general material, then added his press clippings with links to transcripts (which goes directly to notability)

please restore the original content, if you want me to rewrite. 03:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

i kinda object to nuking my work product, because you would rather be safe than sorry.

Corvus cornixtalk 03:07, 6 September 2008 says: "Copying word for word from another site is not fair use. See WP:FU."

But for copying word for word there would be no fair use. user talk:pohick214:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

btw, you might have more 'interest' about the subject than Corvus -- one of the quotes compared him to Edwin Land, existing article on Federation of American Scientists where he worked for 18 years Pohick2 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

"I cut and pasted a copyrighted newsclipping posted on the subjects website" - there's your issue right there. WP:FU does not apply here, and is in general only used for images. If you wish to write this article, please do so from scratch - no borrowing text from anywhere else. It's really not difficult, and I can tell you that aside from being completely legal, it's a hell of a lot more satisfying. _TalkIslander 08:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

"what we have here is failure to communicate"; WP:Bite lol; "be seeing you"Pohick2 (talk 14:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Deleting articles that meet the criteria for speedy deletion is not biting ;). _TalkIslander 14:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for John E. Pike/Temp

An editor has asked for a deletion review of John E. Pike/Temp. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pohick2 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members

WikiProject Novels Roll Call

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 16:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

List of CBBC programmes

Thanks for protecting List of BBC children's television programmes from what appears to be an ongoing orchestrated campaign of adding incorrect/deleting correct information from this list by anon IPs. Why is anybody's guess, although the contributions from these addresses show disruption elsewhere to some extent. Snowy 1973 (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem ;). A few weeks back, we had a problem with one particular IP going mental on all similar TV channel lists, so I blocked him. This time around, it seems to be a number of different IPs, thus it's easier to sprotect the article. _TalkIslander 23:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:BBCRMAcrobat.png proposed for deletion

As the image uploader you really should have been notified of this.

Anyway, I don't know if it had crossed you radar or not, but this image been proposed for deletion, evidently as a test case for all the other stills from BBC idents. Just thought you should know. Jheald (talk) 23:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I had noticed. I haven't decided whether to participate yet or not - I believe strongly that the images do satisfy the criteria for non-free images, but I'm in the minority, by a long shot. If I participate, it'll be futile and somewhat a waste of time. _TalkIslander 08:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Request for page protection

Hi,

Could you reconsider your decision about my request. It seems you misunderstood me.

Best regards, DocteurCosmos (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Responded on RFPP page. _TalkIslander 12:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Protection request: Robert Falcon Scott

I notice that in view of its regular vandalism, Ernest Shackleton has been protected. Robert Falcon Scott suffers equally, and is now likely to be targetted even more. May I request the same level of protection for it as the Shackleton article receives? Brianboulton (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Looking at the article's history, there've only been four questionable edits in the last week - not really enough for page protection. If it gets much worse, let me know, and I'll reassess it :). _TalkIslander 13:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Cisco Exams

Let’s see if we can work together on the article you tag for speed deletion and was deleted as blatant advertising. I need to create a definition for several Cisco networking Exams. These are industry recognized exams like passing the Bar to become a lawyer or passing the CPA Examination to become certified public accountant. Since the majority of IT infrastructure in world involves Cisco network devices the majority of IT professionals must pass several exams to gain specific credentials that make it possible to work as an IT networking professional.

The most common exams are the 640-802 CCNA 640-822 ICND1 640-816 ICND2

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobryant (talk • contribs) 17:36, 24 September 2008

Sorry, but you're gonna have to point to the exact article that I deleted - I can delete anything up to a few hundred a month, so you'll need to tell me exactly which we're talking about here... _TalkIslander 21:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

your adminship

Hello,

I was wondering if you could provide me with a link to your RFA discussion(s). Thank you, bridies (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheIslander (closed as no consensus to promote on 30 August 2007, 31/20/12); Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Islander 2 (closed as successful on 21 January 2008, 56/3/1). Might I ask why? _TalkIslander 19:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

hello

Hello, sadly Randomran is unavailable by means other than his talk page and my message was intended to be read by him. As it happens, though, I was preparing a message to give to you. Firstly, as you may have gleaned, in my brief encounter with you, I found you to be condescending and lacking in understanding in Wikipedia's core policies and general academic English. I feel, from my brief encounter with you, that you are grossly untrustworthy as an administrator. However, there is little (as fair as I am aware) that I can do about this. I was simply interested in the specifics of how you became an administrator. As far as I hear, this is a flawed and difficult process; even then, all the the administrators I have come across seem to exceptionally trustworthy and knowledgeable. I assumed you would have no qualms about defending your adminship, as you have done; please don't take offence. I do not think I have made a mountain of a molehill, sorry; I was indeed intending to contact you directly, as I have explained above, I am just getting round to it, sorry. Finally, I thought my facetiousness was fairly obvious, but if not, no worries; my meaning was the same. Whichever ways (only my level of 'calmness' perhaps not). bridies (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

To be specific, as you requested, again I can only state that you are citing policies which do not remotely support the fictions you are providing (again, in a most condescending manner). There's no way I can be more specific than that. bridies (talk) 20:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hmr's being uncivil again...

Look through user_talk:hmr history —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.128.120 (talk) 21:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pompeii Doctor Who

The edit war just keeps on chugging along between the two folks. Lots42 (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Foxy Loxy's RfA

Hello, this message is to inform you that User:Foxy Loxy has restarted their RfA. The new discussion is located at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Foxy Loxy 2. GlassCobra 09:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)