User talk:JCOasis83
May 2020
[edit]If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)JCOasis83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
- you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your sister (requested edits will still be permitted)
- you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
- you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future
globally renamed Entiverse to JCOasis83
[edit]globally renamed Entiverse to JCOasis83 --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Unblock discussion
[edit]The content of your user page seems at variance to your claim to just be helping out your sister. Could you elaborate upon the statement, "this page is used by her family and trusted associates, mainly brothers Jimmy and Corey. We will be creating pages as needed for the brands and individuals represented"? ANd, yes many SEO's have recognized the benefits of having an article on Wikipedia. But WIkipedia is not a promotional venue. It is an encyclopedia. Subjects of articles must meet notability guidlines.
You wrote about people using this account. Any user account should represent an individual and not a group. You would need to decide on just one person to use this account. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
That doesn't make sense and I explained thoroughly, but I'll try to explain it in a different way since you didn't understand the first time.
I, Jimmy, along with others, including my brother Corey, decided we wanted to help do what we could to get things going for my sister as a notable person. She has released original music on Spotify, Google Play, Tidal, etc., has over 20k followers online as of today's date, has several paid subscribers for her content creation on Onlyfans, and is one of the only transgender women as well as trans people in general to achieve this kind of success from Hyden, KY. Now, after I was banned and explained the rules, I told you that I (the Jimmy mentioned on the profile) would be taking over the account as the single owner. The "brands" I am talking about is my sisters brand "the Godess", which is her stage name, and "Entiverse", which is the label she is releasing music under via Tunecore. So, if this hasn't cleared it up enough you can go ahead and remove my profile entirely, because this explains it all crystal clear. I said "brand(s)" because my sister is known for her stage name as well as her brand name Entiverse (Entiverse Entertainment for the label as seen on her debut single "Worship Me".) Hope this helped you to understand everything.
- Jimmy (the brother and owner of this account.) JCOasis83 (talk) 10:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)