User talk:Jacob0790

Orphaned non-free image File:TigerTigerByJamesPatterson2024.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TigerTigerByJamesPatterson2024.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joy (dog)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joy (dog) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 04:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joy (dog)

The article Joy (dog) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joy (dog) for comments about the article, and Talk:Joy (dog)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joy (dog)

On 28 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joy (dog), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joy was the sole survivor of the Romanov family's execution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joy (dog) (2nd nomination). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joy (dog)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,491 views (853.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Talbot H. Green

On 10 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Talbot H. Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a street in San Francisco was named after a man who used a false identity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Talbot H. Green. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Talbot H. Green), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,416 views (767.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tiger, Tiger (Patterson book) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tiger, Tiger (Patterson book). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong, I removed the promotional lead. Jacob0790 (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiger, Tiger (Patterson book) (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiger, Tiger (Patterson book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiger, Tiger (book) has been accepted

Tiger, Tiger (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Dukhovny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Dukhovny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Dukhovny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding AI-generated content on article Fool Me Once (Coben Novel)

Hello. I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor, but a few months ago I came across the page you created for the Harlan Coben novel Fool Me Once. I was surprised to find that the text of the article seemed to be largely AI-generated, including the plot summary, which I felt was repetitive and did not adequately summarise the plot (being honest, it read a bit like the boiler-plate saying-a-lot-without-saying-anything nonsense that ChatGPT might write when asked to summarise the novel). I'm not aware of any Wikipedia rules regarding the use of AI-generated text to fill articles, even after some searching, but I expect there are rules about the quality of any article, AI-generated or not.

What further alarmed me was when I returned to the article by chance a few hours ago and saw that the text remained largely the same. I checked the talk page and found that you had deleted the post I had left asking editors if they also believed the article to be written by a generative text AI. I then checked the article's edit history and became aware that you had created it. I ran the present-day article text through Copyleaks and it came back as 100% AI-generated. I'm not sure what's going on here but I'd like to ask that you update the article to remove the AI content and replace it with your own work.

Thank you,

188.30.174.234 (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]