User talk:Jonomacdrones
Draft article
[edit]I like what you wrote...the problem will be that much of it is Original Research WP:OR, and Wikipedia does not allow for that. I made a few comments. You might want to find sources for your OR statements, or just see if you can delete them and still have a good article. I'll be glad to help from time to time. Very nice work. DPetersontalk 22:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC) from time to time. Very nice work. DPetersontalk 22:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, its more intended as a collation of work from wikipedia (et al) and other ideas which came up in a discussion- its not a draft article per se, merely an essay- its hard to explain. I'd hoped that i'd not made any leaps in reasoning and that it made sense from the standpoint of someone like your self- that i wasn't advocating nor condemning paedophiles, just stating that ultimately it comes down to a treatable illness if society stops stigmatising paedophilia and paedophiles, and makes sure its safe for them to come forth before they do harm. Thanks a lot for your input- i really appreciate it. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, in that case, give me a few days to read it over and think about it...I'll be glad to help.DPetersontalk 22:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, i'd be interested for your personal views, too- but yeah, take a look and get back to me whenever you have chance- no need to go out of your way. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 22:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, in that case, give me a few days to read it over and think about it...I'll be glad to help.DPetersontalk 22:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, its more intended as a collation of work from wikipedia (et al) and other ideas which came up in a discussion- its not a draft article per se, merely an essay- its hard to explain. I'd hoped that i'd not made any leaps in reasoning and that it made sense from the standpoint of someone like your self- that i wasn't advocating nor condemning paedophiles, just stating that ultimately it comes down to a treatable illness if society stops stigmatising paedophilia and paedophiles, and makes sure its safe for them to come forth before they do harm. Thanks a lot for your input- i really appreciate it. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
CSD-A7 would have probably been more appropriate here, either way the page will be deleted, but its far simpler for whoever is looking at it to ascertain whats wrong if the tag is correct. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 20:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Considering the text of the article, though, I thought that is was more nonsense than lack of notability (if that is what CSD-A7 is, I'm still new here). I mean, what could be more notable than "the firt (sic) person on jupiter and [becoming] it's supreme overlord enslaving all it's people"??? :P Thanks for the help, though! DangerousNerd talk 20:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me so quickly and helping me out with my edits. I really appreciate it! PS: Good luck with Ubuntu! I've been a user for a long time now and have never looked back. DangerousNerd talk 21:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Considering the text of the article, though, I thought that is was more nonsense than lack of notability (if that is what CSD-A7 is, I'm still new here). I mean, what could be more notable than "the firt (sic) person on jupiter and [becoming] it's supreme overlord enslaving all it's people"??? :P Thanks for the help, though! DangerousNerd talk 20:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
protal
[edit]you do understand what i deleted was a list food and topics related to food and it was on the halo portal? Agentheartlesspain 21:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
i blanked it because i couldnt find where it started and then after i blanked it i removed it and im on halo project and will probably do some articles soon, no more homework
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal%3AHalo&diff=138221725&oldid=136459450 i orginally blanked the page because i couldnt find that part to delete because it was too big after i blanked the food part i went to the topic food in the protal and go rid of it
i blanked it first then went to the topic and deleted it i blanked it because i couldnt find the section where it started and i thought by blanking something that be deleted anyways is right appartently im wrong and confused
Unreliable sources
[edit]In reply to your last; I've been tracing the sources for a number of dubious astronomical claims at Talk:History of astronomy#common misconceptions. In the course of doing so I've identified a number of sources that publish undocumented claims that fly in the face of the consensus among historians of science and the primary texts.
I'm finally moving ahead and deleting this material. --SteveMcCluskey 16:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
About Akamai
[edit]Hello I read your comment on Wikipedia and would like to contact you. If you do not mind, please give me your email address then I will send you one email. My email is "huonggol@yahoo.com"
Thank you & expecting to hearing from you soon. Regards, Huong Dang
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The Simpsons WikiProject membership update
[edit]The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.
Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.
If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!
The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 11:45, 9 November 2024 UTC [refresh]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Giselle (Disney). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 03:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
The template says: "If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced." I improved, sourced, and renamed parts of the page. Because I did so and objected to the deletion, I removed the template. I believe that was the only thing I removed from the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.62.217 (talk) 03:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Compassvale.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image:Compassvale.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Compassvale.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cheers, Jonomacdrones (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
[edit]| Happy Birthday | from the Birthday Committee | |
|---|---|---|
 Wishing Jonomacdrones a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake! | ||
--SMS Talk 20:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
HaPPY (Belated) BIRTHDAY!
[edit]
|
Hey, Jonomacdrones. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- RobNS 05:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
Happy Birthday from Canada! ;-) --RobNS 05:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Tommy
[edit]OK, but all the other songs (bar the singles) are non-notable. See also this AfD. indopug (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
I placed the notabiltiy tag on because the notability guidelines suggest that a subject must have received (preferably multiple) significant coverage from independent, reliable sources. Since the article doesn't present anything like this, I'm baffled as to why you were baffled. In what way does the article meet the guidelines? Marasmusine (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion
[edit]IMO, using a level 4im warning as a first warning is generally a bit harsh, unless it is a vandalism edit by an obvious sockpuppet, or a long term vandal. You could use {{uw-bv}} or {{uw-v2}} to start with if they've made an obvious bad faith edit. Cheers and happy editing,--Ashbey…whisper… 00:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Wow
[edit]AFD IS a discussion about the notability of articles because AFD is for debating what articles should stay or go (Look at other AFDs and you will see that you are wrong.) WP:N IS important to AFD because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and AFD is about debating what article belongs and doesn't belong in this encyclopedia. Significant coverage in WP:N is NOT the same as verifiability. You verifed it, but you did NOT show notability. If download sites showed notability, then every software would have an article. A tutorial is NOT significant coverage because it is not commentary on the software. It just tells people how to use the software. You DON'T understand AFD. Heck, you don't even understand the notability guidelines even though you have been a member since 2006. Having a lot of people does NOT show notability if it doesn't have significant coverage. I did search for sources which is what I said in my nomination and I did say it in my own words. Joe Chill (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstood significant coverage and I didn't (as the hundreds of AFDs that I have participated in show). Those are trivial mentions because they don't go into detail on the software. Download sites don't show notability and a tutorial doesn't show notability (which is all that you listed). All that I saw in searches were download sites and tuturials which has never been enough for notability. And AFD is not a vote, it is a debate so you don't have to go to the editor's talk page. (ask any active AFD user and they will tell you that). Joe Chill (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Now please stop saying that I'm doing it wrong when I have have participated in many AFDs, I got many articles deleted for the reasons that I stated above, and you are not active in AFD. Joe Chill (talk) 19:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I see what you've done, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em eh? Something on the talkpage would've been helpful. Have articles that long, old and with so many links to other articles (which would essentially be orphaned) really been deleted due to your tags? How sad. (the fact that they were deleted that is, not you, although I don't see why anyone would think that.) Feudonym (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
France
[edit]"Wikipedia Vendettas are so 2005". That made me laugh so hard. Thanks for that lol. Onopearls (t/c) 22:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sobranie Black Russian cigarettes.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sobranie Black Russian cigarettes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jonomacdrones/sandbox
[edit]User:Jonomacdrones/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jonomacdrones/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jonomacdrones/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Compassvale.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Compassvale.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Compassvale.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Compassvale.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ted Spooner
[edit]
The article Ted Spooner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO, unable to find sources which are more than brief or passing mentions of this person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 22:21, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
[edit]
{{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Meerkat sn.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:JohnSmithsFridge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:SobraniePacket.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SobraniePacket.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
