User talk:Kore's Cosmaupia

Kore's Cosmaupia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kore's Cosmaupia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in dog sports, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Please review WP:NOTBROKEN - FlightTime (open channel) 00:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to stress this. Ignoring NOTBROKEN is a waste of time and resources. In the case of Blue Tongue Entertainment, you piped de Blob to De Blob twice in separate edits, which I edited out again in subsquent edits. Lordtobi (✉) 07:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm here to make the same point. Please do not replace piped redirects that are not broken. At best, the edit is purely cosmetic but at worst, it breaks a redirect to a specific section. Moreover, do not mark such changes as "typos" in your edit summary, as they most surely were deliberate. It is strange to see these talk page messages ignored. Please do recognize that continuing to make such edits, in light of three requests that you stop, will be viewed as disruptive and result in a block. czar 17:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're still doing this. Please stop. You've broken several links or changed the context of what they meant. -- ferret (talk) 17:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kore's Cosmaupia! You created a thread called Sending feedback at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

	Nice to meet you ~
	~ thanks for your edits ~ have a great holiday and a peaceful new year ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kore's Cosmaupia! Thank you for your contributions. I am Viewratio and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Viewratio (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendigo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquian language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Boxing Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. Kore's Cosmaupia (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC) Kore's Cosmaupia[reply]

Wikipedia Beta's longevity

I activated this option to test out 6 (now 7) features and update categories, and after I came back I noticed the blue button and it unexpectedly disappeared. Can anyone tell me how long the program lasts? Kore's Cosmaupia (talk) 19:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Kore's Cosmaupia[reply]

Wikipedia

Per this edit please review WP:NOTBROKEN. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the entire section and understand the rules. Kore's Cosmaupia (talk) 03:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Kore's Cosmaupia[reply]

Short edits descriptions

Hi! It is encouraged to give precise and detailed descriptions to the edits you make. Minor edits shall be marked as "Minor". Pages are monitored by many editors through their Watchlist and being more specific you show your respect to them.

Also, if it possible, make one edit per page instead of a series of minor ones. It makes checking the history of edits much easier. --Dignitee (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't put "typos" or 'minor edits' in edit summaries when they aren'

Typos was obviously wrong, minor edits should never change content. Doug Weller talk 13:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Unreal (video game series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm leaving a stronger warning since I see that nearly every message on your talk page is warnings or messages left by other editors about your typo corrections and redirect changes. Please stop. You are not improving the articles and in some cases are breaking redirects and changing the meaning of links. -- ferret (talk) 17:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know any better. Kore's Cosmaupia (talk) 18:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Kore's Cosmaupia[reply]

You can only claim that so many times. You literally have a warning from just a month ago about WP:NOTBROKEN where you replied that you read the guideline. -- ferret (talk) 19:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Armello, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You have been warned multiple times about WP:NOTBROKEN, and yet you still do this. Please reconsider your actions. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]