User talk:RoDeWo
|
Unspecified source for Image:22-545.profiles_fig1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:22-545.profiles_fig1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 21:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:550ALU 4C G 2006 RGB.jpg
[edit]
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:550ALU 4C G 2006 RGB.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:UKLFreiburg.jpg)
[edit]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Mal 'ne andere Frage...
[edit]Ähm, mal was eher persönliches...Du studierst Medizin in Freiburg? Kennst Du zufällig [ ? Braune Haare, blasser Teint und Augen wie ein Ozean an einem sanften, sonnigen Frühlingsmorgen... Würde mich brennend interessieren was aus ihr geworden ist. Kannst mich übrigens Flo nennen...muss besoffen gewesen sein als ich mir das Pseudonym ausgedacht habe. Fred Plotz (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Lucas,
- Ja, studier' ich, werde aber gerade fertig und fange die Diss an. Hab den Artikel gemacht, um mich ein bisschen abzulenken (zeitweise zu viel). Der link war kein Bild, sondern ihre Diss in Freidok, mit der sie offensichtlich gerade fertig geworden ist (sehr zügig, die kleine...); wollte nur den Namen nicht hier posten. Ich war mit ihr in einer Klasse und in der Mittelstufe jahrelang furchtbar verknallt in sie...ist aber nix daraus geworden. Dachte, wenn Du schon im klinischen bist, und sie vielleicht jetzt Assistenzärztin ist, kennst Du sie vielleicht? Das mit den Rankings ist, gerade was Freiburg angeht, schon 'ne Unverschämtheit. Erlärt sich aber aus der Methode: Jiao Tong (ARWU) bezieht zB nur Artikel, die in Nature und Science veröffentlicht wurden (amerikanische Zeitschriften) in die Wertung mit ein. Da es in diesen Rankings immer sehr eng zugeht, ist klar, dass dadurch die englischsprachigen Länder immer besonders gut aussehen und andere Unis verdrängen. Die Times (THES) bezieht die Hälfte der Punktzahlen aus peer und employers reviews. Wo kriegen sie die Adressen her? Von Abonenten natürlich, und die sitzen natürlich hauptsächlich in englischsprachigen Ländern, oder in ehemaligen Kolonien mit einer anglophilen Oberschicht, die wohl auch meistens dort studiert hat. Heidelberg kommt noch relativ gut weg, und teilweise sogar sehr gut (weltweit 17 in Biomedizin war schon ziemlich OK), weil es halt im Ausland die bekannteste deutsche Uni ist, und bis vorm Krieg wirklich weltspitze war. Davon zehren wir teilweise noch. Aber man darf das Ganze nicht so ernst nehmen. Die meisten wissen ja, dass Rankings immer mit Vorsicht zu genießen sind, und Größen wie Qualität der Lehre sowieso nicht messbar sind. Bist Du eigentlich gerade in Maryland, oder warum der tag? Fred Plotz (talk) 15:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hallo Kollege,
- na, wie läufts? Ein Ami der Allemannisch kann...faszinierend. Bist aber hier aufgewachsen, nehm' ich an? Ja, bin auch mal gespannt was aus der Exzellenzinitiative wird, glaub' aber nicht, dass das einfach so im Sande verlaufen wird, können wir uns als Nation nicht leisten. Forschung ist ja heutzutage primär 'ne Geldfage, und da lässt sich einiges machen, glaub' ich. Sicherlich werden wir nicht gleich ein deutsches Harvard auf die Beine stellen, aber Platzierungen wie in dem Ranking der Europäischen Kommission, also 4 deutsche Unis in den Euro- top ten, sollten mittelfristig möglich sein. Damit wären wir dann auch im wetweiten Maßstab gut dabei. Nach der Diss will ich noch mal für 'n' Jahr nach England und den LL.M. machen - ist heutzutage karrierenotwendig -, ja und dann wartet noch das Referendariat. Wie weit bist Du eigentlich? Fred Plotz (talk) 12:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Servus!
- Ja, sagen wir top 30 sollte für 3, 4 deutsche Unis wirklich drin sein. Ich schätze wir müssen, zumindest in Naturwissenschaften, einfach konsequent in englisch publizieren. Das hieße zwar, sich einer Art Kulturimperialismus zu ergeben, aber andererseits wurde eine halbe Ewigkeit nur auf Latein publiziert, also was solls... Was die Studiengebühren betrifft, ist das ein zweischneidiges Schwert: Es steht zwar im Hochschulrahmengesetz, dass diese der Verbesserung der Lehre zugute kommen müssen; was das heißt, ist aber auslegungsbedürftig. Einige Unis nehmen diese zusätzlichen Gelder, um damit zB Baumaßnahmen zu finanzieren, deren Ermöglichung eigentlich originäre Länderaufgabe ist. Wenn dies der Fall ist, dann werden lediglich Lasten privatisiert, ohne dass der Studentenschaft irgendwelche direkten Vorteile zugute kämen. Dies kommt in meinen Augen einer zweckentfremdenden Veruntreuung recht nahe. Meines Erachtens nach sollten die zusätzlichen Einnahmen primär dafür Verwendung finden, mehr Lehrkräfte einzustellen (und damit meine ich Lehrkräfte, keine Professoren, die Aufsichtsratsmandate sammeln wie andere Leute Briefmarken und sich schon beklagen, wenn sie 6 Stunden pro Woche unterrichten müssen). Damit ließe sich auch das recht schwergewichtige staff/ student-ratio-Kriterium in den Rankings verbessern, in dem alle deutschen Unis nicht sehr gut aussehen, was sich dann wiederum recht vorteilhaft auf die Gesamtpositionierung auswirken dürfte. Zur Forschungsfinanzierung dürfen die Studiengebühren jedenfalls nicht eingesetzt werden, auch nicht im Rahmen einer Umschichtung der Mittel: das wäre ein Umgehungstatbestand. Die Exzellenzgelder fließen ja ohnehin vollständig in die Forschung und ich gehe davon aus, dass die Drittmittel aus staatlichen und privaten Forschungsaufträgen sich in den nächsten Jahren mehr auf die Elite- Unis konzentrieren werden und nicht, wie bisher, gleichmäßig auf alle Unis verteilt werden, was sicherlich noch ein Relikt des von Dir zu Recht beklagten egalitären Ansatzes ist. Das ist jedenfalls exakt die Methode, mit der die Briten es geschafft haben, ihre G 5 Unis (Oxbridge, Imperial, UCL und LSE) konstant in der Weltspitze zu positionieren: die sind nämlich mit sehr weitem Abstand die drittmittelstärksten Unis in GB, was übrigens in erster Linie, unglaublich aber wahr, aus staatlichen Forschungsaufträgen resultiert. Mit den Studiengebühren in den USA hast Du, soweit es die privaten Unis angeht, natürlich recht. Fast $50,000 sind einfach indiskutabel. Andererseits praktizieren die Ivies und die top liberal arts colleges ein "need-blind admission" Verfahren, mit der Folge dass zB in Amherst 66% der Studenten ganz oder zu einem großen Teil kostenlos studieren. Die staatlichen Unis in den Staaten haben, für in state students, eigentlich recht manierliche Preise: Berkeley zB nimmt ca. $ 12,000 (€ 8,500) p.a. für Californier, worin dann aber tuition, fees, room und board enthalten sind. Wenn Du das mal hochrechnest, kommst Du in Deutschland alles in allem nicht sehr viel günstiger weg. In England jedenfalls ist es deutlich teurer. Ich habe zwar "nur" ca. 4000 Pfund Studiengebühren bezahlt, aber dazu kamen noch gepflegte 7,500 Pfund für eine 5 qm Bude im Studentenwohnheim(!), vom Leben in London ganz zu schweigen. (4,50 Pfund für einen Macciato und so...das waren mal 12 Mark!) Aber das scheint grundsätzlich auch der Trend in Deutschland zu sein, unsere nicht-konsekutiven Master's kosten heute schon bis zu €9,000 pro Jahr, und der einjährige MBA an der Uni Mannheim kostet €17,900. Generell halte ich von diesem Trend eigentlich nicht viel, Bildung ist keine Ware, sondern ein Menschenrecht. Andererseits können die Unis das Geld ja wirklich gebrauchen und wenn der Staat das nicht als Freibrief betrachtet, seinen ureigensten Aufgaben (zB dem oben angesprochenen Hochschulbau) nicht mehr adäquat nachzukommen und so letztlich seinen Haushalt auf Kosten der Studenten zu sanieren, solls mir recht sein. Dann müsste aber das Stipendienwesen, wie in den USA vorbildlich zu beobachten, entsprechend angepasst werden. Naja...wir werden sehen was passiert. Übrigens: Ihr dürft schon während dem Studium promovieren? Kommt man da mit dem Pensum noch klar? Zu welchem Thema promovierst Du denn? Deinem Schweigen zum ursprünglichen Thema entnehme ich übrigens, dass Du von der Dame noch nie was gehört hast? Sie hat am UKL in der Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie promoviert. Kennst Du da Leute? Gruß, Flo Fred Plotz (talk) 17:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
[edit]
|
){kind=link}
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 01:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia meetup
[edit]As someone who may live or work near Washington D.C., you may be interested - if you've not heard already - about the meetup scheduled for Saturday, May 17th, at Union Station. For details, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4.
You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians in Maryland. Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo University Freiburg.gif)
[edit]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009
[edit]The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.)
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here.
Volunteer opportunity in Bethesda, Thursday, July 16
[edit]The Wikimedia Foundation will be conducting an all-day Academy at the National Institutes of Health, in Bethesda, Maryland, on Thursday, July 16. The team that will be teaching at the Academy, a mix of paid staff and volunteers, is looking for four more volunteers to be teaching assistants, providing one-to-one assistance in workshops whenever a workshop participant has a problem following the instructional directions. (We currently have two editors signed up as teaching assistants, and are looking for a total of six.)
The NIH editing workshops are only for two hours, but volunteers are asked to meet the Wikimedia Foundation team at the hotel in Bethesda at about 7:15 a.m. (time to be finalized shortly) and to stay for the entire day, which ends at 4:30 p.m. Lunch will be provided. (The full schedule can be found here.)
The team is not necessarily looking for expert editors (though they are welcome), just people who can help novices who might get stuck when trying to do some basic things. If you've been an editor for at least 3 months, and have done at least 500 edits, you probably qualify.
If you're interested, please send John Broughton an email. If you might be interested, but would like further information, please post a note on his user talk page, so that he can respond there, and others can see what was asked.
(You have received this posting because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland or DC. --EdwardsBot (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC))
D.C. Meetup, Saturday, September 26
[edit]The 8th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, September 26, starting at 6 p.m. The event will be at Burma Restaurant (740 6th St, NW near the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station). For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 8. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) --EdwardsBot (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MedFakWiki.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:MedFakWiki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!
[edit]| Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
|---|---|
 |
FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
poorly structured and poorly written changes
[edit]If you know better - do it rather than destroy.Xx236 (talk) 08:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
[edit]Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.
We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
- Publish an article to the journal.
- Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
- Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
- Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
- Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
- Join the editorial board.
- Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
- Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
- Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Technical work like template designing for the journal.
- Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updates
wijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikael
- Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach
DiptanshuTalk 14:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.
The file File:Uniklinik.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Uni Freiburg.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Logo Uni Freiburg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
