User talk:S-Solutions Editor

Welcome!

Hello, S-Solutions Editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:S-Solutions Editor/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:S-Solutions Editor/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:S-Solutions Editor/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

S-Solutions Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

ssolutions2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I apologise for going against your policy. Please unblock my account. I'll review my article and ensure that all is well next.

Decline reason:

This does not address any of the problems that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 14:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the actual problem that led to my account being blocked? S-Solutions Editor (talk) 14:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is described in the block notice. I'll clarify one aspect for you- your proposed new username was no better. 331dot (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S-Solutions Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my actions have violated Wikipedia's community guidelines. and for this, I sincerely apologize. It was not my intention to disrupt the community or to harm the integrity of the platform. I deeply regret my actions.

I have taken the time to thoroughly read and understand the community guidelines to ensure that I fully comprehend the rules and expectations of the Wikipedia community. I assure you that moving forward, I will adhere strictly to these guidelines and contribute positively to the platform.

I kindly request that you reconsider the block on my account. I believe in the mission of Wikipedia to provide free and accessible knowledge to everyone, and I wish to be a part of this noble cause. I promise to respect the rules, other users, and the spirit of open knowledge that Wikipedia embodies.

Thank you for considering my appeal. God bless you!

Decline reason:

The problem with chatbot-generated unblock requests like this one is that they say nothing whatsoever about either you or why you are blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

S-Solutions Editor (talk) 15:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}S-Solutions Editor (talk) 09:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You posted a blank request, we can't consider a blank request. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize for violating the blocking policy of Wikipedia. I fully acknowledge my mistake and take full responsibility for my actions. I did not initially take the time to read the policy and I now realize that this was a grave error. I want to assure you that I never intended to promote any business or individual, and I only created a Wikipedia account to get familiar with the platform and to write articles.

I received no compensation for the article that was blocked and I see now that it was a mistake to post it without first understanding the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. I deeply apologize for this and I promise to ensure that it never happens again. If I am unblocked, I will commit to writing quality articles that adhere to Wikipedia's policies and to networking with other contributors to gain a full understanding of the platform.

Thank you for your understanding and I hope to be allowed to make a positive contribution to the Wikipedia community. S-Solutions Editor (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not make this as a unblock request, and it still seems to be written by a chatbot. If your skill at English is insufficient to write an acceptable request yourself, you may feel more comfortable editing a version of Wikipedia that is in a language with which you are more familiar. 331dot (talk) 10:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]