User talk:Scandiescot

Welcome!

Hello, Scandiescot, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

Please note WP guidelines: "Wikipedia will not remove content because of the internal bylaws of some organizations that forbid information about the organization to be displayed online. Any rules that forbid members of a given organization, fraternity, or religion to show a name or image do not apply to Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations." Tengu800 04:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Please note WP guidelines: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source... Sometimes editors will disagree on whether material is verifiable. The burden of identifying a reliable source lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing any reliable source that directly supports the material." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PROVEIT#Burden_of_evidence

Please sign all of your comments on talk pages

Please sign all (!) of the comments you inserted in Nichiren Shoshu talk. "Signing your posts on talk pages, both for the article and non-article namespaces, is good practice, and facilitates discussion by helping identify the author of a particular comment. Other users can then navigate to a talk page and address their comments to the specific, relevant user(s)." (see Wikipedia:Signatures) JimRenge (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes. Thank you for the reminder. Scandiescot (talk) 05:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do wait until consensus on matter is found

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.

"Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful." Reliable source: Wikipedia:Vandalism. You're welcome. Scandiescot (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

′Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. Abusive creation or usage of user accounts and IP addresses may also constitute vandalism.

Vandalism is prohibited. While editors are encouraged to warn and educate vandals, warnings are by no means necessary for an administrator to block.So far this is a warning, nothing more, nothing less. WAIT until issue is resolved. --Catflap08 (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Key phrase: "in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia."

"WAIT until issue is resolved." See above, "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism..." Scandiescot (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about content in terms of text as another user has pointed out earlier. You simply remove information even though the discussion is still going on. NO consensus has been reached, NO decision been made by Commons. --Catflap08 (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content [N.b. An image is content] is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful." Reliable source: Wikipedia:Vandalism. You're welcome. Scandiescot (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You made quite clear in your first post where you are coming from – your sects bylaws. This site is not owned by Nichiren Shoshu nor SGI.--Catflap08 (talk) 20:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I've also made it quite clear why that is relevant. WP guidelines for talk pages state, "Do not misrepresent other people".

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theoderic the Great may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Theoderic the Great''' (thē-ŏd'ə-rik, {{lang-got|𐌸𐌹𐌿𐌳𐌰𐍂𐌴𐌹𐌺𐍃}}, ''Thiudareiks''; {{lang-la|Flāvius Theodericus}}; {{lang-el|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scandiescot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Scandiescot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I am blocked, and can not send a message to the editor who blocked me.

Accept reason:

This should be addressed. Let me know if you still can't edit. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see a block on this account. Please copy and paste the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. If you are autoblocked, specific instructions on how to appeal should be provided. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni, the message on the edit page is:

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia.

You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them.

Editing from (my IPv6 address) has been blocked (disabled) by Berean Hunter for the following reason(s):

This network has been used improperly by someone on your network. It has therefore been blocked as a precaution to prevent abuse and damage to Wikipedia.

Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. Anonymous editing and account creation may be currently blocked for this IP or range. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

If you do not have an account (IP editor): If you do not currently have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. Please use this form to request an account under your preferred username. It may take a few days to process your request, but we will attend to it as fast as possible.

If you have an account (registered user): Please login to edit. (I am currently logged in as Scandiescot, but still see the error message.)

squelch sock account creation and IP socking, multiple sockmasters, one using long term

This block has been set to expire: 12:47, 16 September 2019.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]