User talk:Serinity

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please now that we operate on consensus around here. Major edits to contentious articles should be discussed on the talk page first. Or, make the changes a little at a time, with full edit summaries. I've reverted your edit to John Lott, but retained the POV tag you put there. Please indicate your specific issues on talk:John Lott

Sam, thanks for keeping the POV tag. That was nice of you. I confess that I don't know a lot about the issues being discussed here and I am somewhat biased on this the issue of guns, but there appears to have already been an extensive list of issues already on a variety of points on the talk page (or is it the discussion page) and the anti-Lott side doesn't seem to want to have a discussion. The one thing that is clear is that there is a big disagreement here. I am more interested in Second Amendment issues, but the talk page that you point to does not seem useful.

Locked Lott page

So now one of the biased people locked the page on their biased version. Isn't there anything that can be done about this?

FYI - I asked for help here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance#I_could_use_some_help--Cbaus 05:30, 27 December 2005 (EDST-USA)

3rr

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Sasquatcht|c 10:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, internal links to wikipedia, such as you keep re-adding [1], do *not* belong in wiki articles. Those edits of yours are effectively vandalism, for which you can be blocked. William M. Connolley 12:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

you might try wikinfo

Try writing for wikinfo; they have a sympathetic point of view.

User:Serenity

Is this the same editor as user:Serenity? It appears so. Please use only one or the other account on a topic. Using two different accounts on the same topic is a violation of WP:SOCK, and could result in the blocking of one or both accounts. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]