User talk:Shyamw1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shyamw1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BenLinus 1214^talk 20:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Shyamw1/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Thanks! Rankersbo (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Shyamw1! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia🎄/tlk 17:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, G. Parthasarathy, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not create multiple copies of drafts on the same person. This draft, like the previous one, needs more than one source. The subject is almost certainly notable; however, since he is notable, he presumably has been written about by multiple sources. Also, has this draft been submitted using two similar but different user names? If so, is that a coincidence? Why? For advice on multiple accounts, please ask for advice at the Teahouse. (Also ask there about multiple reliable sources.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shyamw1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shyamw1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

AfC notification: User:Shyamw1/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert,

You mentioned that there is already an article on Gopalapuram Parthasasrathy in Wikipedia. I have written about Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, not Gopalapuram Parthasarathy. They are 2 different people, both were foreign policy experts. Gopalapuram Parthasarathy is still alive whereas the one I wrote about, Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, is deceased. If you have read both the articles you will realize that these are 2 different people.

I also read another comment about not having enough sources in my article - I don't remember which reviewer mentioned this. During my research I could only find 2 New York Times artilces on G.P and a book published during his birth centenary. These are both reliable, published sources and contain the necessary information.

Please look at both articles on G. Parthasarathy (the one that already exists in Wikipedia about a different person) and the one I submitted. I don't know how else to convince you that these are not the same person.

Shyamw1Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, G. Parthasarathy, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is an existing article on a living person. This sandbox and the draft appear to be about a different person. How are they related? However, please make updates to the version in draft space. Please do not resubmit this sandbox again if it is the same person as is the subject of the draft. If there are three different people, please explain.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are currently three pages about people with the same or similar names. There is an article in article space about Gopalapuram Parthasarathy or Gopalaswami Parthasarathy, who is a living person and appears to be a retired Indian diplomat. There is a draft Draft: G. Parthasarathy in draft space, about an earlier Indian diplomat, 1912-1995. You have also submitted a sandbox draft, User:Shyamw1/sandbox about an Indian diplomat who was born in 1912 and died in 1995. As far as I can tell, Draft: G. Parthasarathy and User:Shyamw1/sandbox are almost the same. They contain much of the same language and appear to be mostly the work of the same author. They are almost certainly biographies of the same person. Please compare the two drafts. Updates should be made to Draft: G. Parthasarathy. Are you User:Wshyam? If so, and you want the version in draft space deleted, you may request its deletion, but, if so, please explain why you are using two accounts with similar names. If you and User:Wshyam are really two different users, please coordinate your edits. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, G. Parthasarathy, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please explain whether this person and the other G. Parthasarathy, who both were born in 1912, are the same or different. If they are the same, edit Draft: G. Parthasarathy. If not, explain.

This draft is still inadequately sourced.

Continued resubmission of this draft while the other draft is still pending is wasting the time of the reviewers and is tendentious. (I know that the existing article is for a living person and that the two drafts are for dead people who appear to be the same dead person.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shyamw1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

~~Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Shyamw1/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.~~

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please try addressing my questions about the two drafts and the one or two authors, rather than just resubmitting. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert,

I didn't intend to make uncosntructive edits and I am sorry if that's what happened. Can you please provide specific examples of the "unconstructive" so I understand what you mean? I was merely trying to add more reliable sources to my article since your earlier comment said I needed more sources. Also, I would like to know how to delete the first draft I submitted so I am not wasting a reviewer's time? I would like my second submission (the one with more sources) to be reviewed instead. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

I am deleting the warning because I realize that I may have been harsh. We are both confused, and I am asking for advice at the Teahouse. ~~

Thank you - I look forward to the advice. Any help I can get to improve the article and have it accepted will be greatly appreciated. Shyamw1 (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Robert, I read Wikipedia's reference for beginners section several times over the last couple of days and I redid all the references as best I could. Could you please review and let me know if anything still needs correction? Thanks so much. Shyamw1 (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gopalaswami Parthasarathy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Don't worry about that phrase. Your draft has been moved to draft space and is still being considered. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Shyamw1 (talk) 12:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Just wondering about the status of my submission on G. Parthasarathy. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Dear Robert,

I am wondering about the status of my draft article on G. Parthasarathy. I haven't heard anything since my last submission at the end of June. Please advise. Thanks. Shyamw1 (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Shyamw1! I'm Wiae. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wiae /tlk 13:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wiae, I submitted the draft after editing the language by following your instructions. However, I'm not sure I did it right. Is there any way to know if I submitted it correctly or not? Thanks in advance for your help.Shyamw1 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gopalaswami Parthasarathy (diplomat) has been accepted

Gopalaswami Parthasarathy (diplomat), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I wish to thank all the editors who have patiently guided me through this long process and helped me better understand how Wikipedia works. Shyamw1 (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Dear SisterTwister, I tried searching for this article on Wikipedia but couldn't find it. Does it take a while for it to show up on Wikipedia? If yes, when can I expect to see it there? Thanks, again. Shyamw1 (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

Dear Sister Twister,

When I search Wikipedia for the article I submitted on G. Parthasarathy, I only see the article on the other diplomat who is also known as G. Parthasarathy. I do not see the one I wrote about on the search results list. Just wondering how to make that appear when someone does a search. It is rare that two people with the same name also share the same career and that maybe the problem here. Look forward to your response. Thank you. Shyamw1 (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]

It's there - thank you! Shyamw1 (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Shyamw1[reply]