User talk:Targaryen/Archive 2012
A cookie for you!
[edit]Thank you for applying for Adminship. I'm sorry it didn't seem to turn out well in this case and I hope to see you back in four to six months. Not having a successful RFA isn't anything to get down about, it happens. Just try to take what you've learned to improve your editing before next time. There is plenty of work to do with the tools and there will be plenty more still in 6 months. Keep up the good work. v/r - TP 19:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you! :) SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 19:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you to go with the cookie!
[edit]I second that kind message from TP. Before trying again you may wish to read Advice for RfA candidates and follow the links in it. You may also like to check out my notes for RfA because it you can match them, you'll match anyone's criteria. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page, and I look forward to supporting you next time round. Best wishes for 2012, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you too! :) SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 10:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
RFA Nomination
[edit]I know I didn't vote to support, but I'm sorry that your RFA nomination didn't go how you'd hoped. For what it's worth, I laughed and appreciated your response to that question! I hope to see you back for another, more successful attempt, in the near future! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC).
Hotel Polen fire
[edit]The lede still needs more. It needs to be fleshed out as much as possible, so that it has at least two sizable paragraphs (instead of the current three meagre ones). I'd also suggest moving the sources from the lede to the body of the article, as (I hope) that the same information appears later on in the article with appropriate sources. Are you sure there isn't more information on the fire, either? It's relatively short, so it could use all the information possible. Don't worry about adding too much detail in this case--once the article has been expanded, I, and other reviewers, can work with you to tighten it up a bit. Do you have any more background information on the hotel? The reactions? Aftermath? etc. Hope these suggestions are helpful! Auree ★ 02:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- I should need to find a book to be able to add more information. Much of the detailed information comes from the fire department report and it is unsure how much these guys were "covering their asses" so to say. So I guess this has to go on the back-burner until I find more information elsewhere. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 02:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
David Wijnkoop
[edit]Knowing your political preferences, I don't think you will have much sympathy for the political ideas of David Wijnkoop. I have been translating the article about him, but I think is rather dodgy and badly sourced. Can you take a very critical look at the article draft and shower it generously with comments about lacking info, missing sources and everything else you can think about? (Just throw it into the text, preferably as small text) You can find the draft at User:Night of the Big Wind/Workpage11. Thanks in advance. Night of the Big Wind talk 18:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- You can find sources on Google Books, but of course you are probably a long way from a library which stacks these books. Maybe some of the books he wrote are online, he died more than 70 years ago so his works are now PD (then again as a communist he probably wouldn't have cared much about copyrights anyways):
- You can also find a few articles on http://kranten.kb.nl
- I would suggest incorporating more of the text behind bullet points into the main text. It reads better and makes the article look less like a CV. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 22:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, rewrote a few parts as you had adviced. Night of the Big Wind talk 12:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
[edit]Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1760 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
LeasePlan
[edit]Hi - thanks for making the sensible name change to the LeasePlan page. Can I suggest you change it further to "LeasePlan UK", as the page is about the UK part of an international operation? (I've not done this myself for COI reasons - I work for a firm that works for LeasePlan UK.) Markpackuk (talk) 10:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your help referencing The Exit List. Stifle (talk) 10:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Re:Dutch-to-English
[edit]I would be grateful if you could check quality of google translation (my understanding - National Bank of Belgium agreed to distribute images of the banknotes it has issued using the same rules as euro banknotes) - please reply on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BEL-500f-rev.jpg Bulwersator (talk) 06:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- There's no need to use Google Translate as the site is available in English. See: http://www.nbb.be/pub/02_00_00_00_00/02_02_00_00_00/02_02_06_00_00.htm?l=en SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 10:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ops - and thanks! Bulwersator (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Monmouthpedia Signpost
[edit]I never said anything about other wikis. I only said that it is the only Wikipedia project dedicated to a single town. SL93 (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Hoofddorp train disaster by Cor Mulder (ANP).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 11:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
You PRODded this, but the article author made an objection on the talk page, so per the spirit of WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have to decline the PROD. Feel free to take it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
LEPTON CMS at AfD
[edit]I answered you. Please have a look. --Develope PC (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think what is already is said in the debate covers its pretty well and I don't have anything to add. LEPTON CMS may be a fine product but there are thousands of other products which are also fine but aren't covered on Wikipedia. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 22:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Elfstedentocht
[edit]I've reverted your deletion of the 2012 Elfstedentocht material. It is looking increasingly likely that the race will be run, and the material in the current article will be useful for transferral to a dedicated article on the 2012 race if it is run. Should an announcement be forthcoming that the race won't be run, then the material can be removed. See my comments on the talk page. Mjroots (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cocoanut Grove interior.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cocoanut Grove interior.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
AfD and PROD notifications
[edit]Hi SpeakFree. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links on the page), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
SceneAround
[edit]I have restored SceneAround so get in quick and reference it before someone else want to delete it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I added some references. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 01:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Journey into Space (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Late changes
[edit]Hi, how come the DYK hook at Template:Did you know nominations/STRAT-X was changed from "disapprove capitalism" to "disapproving of capitalism" at Template:Did you know/Preparation area 3? Peculiar... --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 07:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't change it, someone must have copyedited it because they thought it looked better. It's in the queue now so only admins can edit it. If you want it changed back you could contact an admin or ask a question on the DYK talkpage. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 11:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Journey into Space (book)
[edit]On 3 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Journey into Space (book), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Toby Litt's novel Journey into Space takes place on board of a generation ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Journey into Space (book).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Bombing of the Bezuidenhout, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages V2 and Koninklijke Bibliotheek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I closed the PUF discussion because the file was already tagged as non-free. If you want to discuss its compliance with WP:NFCC, you should begin a discussion at WP:FFD or WP:NFCR. Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 07:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NTR logo profielfotoTwitter.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:NTR logo profielfotoTwitter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Red Week (Netherlands)
[edit]I have recently created an article about the Red Week in the Netherlands (Dutch: De Roode Week. Also known as Troelstra's mistake, Vergissing van Troelstra). You was interested in that topic, and therefore I thought you would be glad to know that there is an article about it. Feel free to read the article and improve it.
Sapere aude22 (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! Looks good. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 19:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Bombing of the Bezuidenhout
[edit]On 15 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bombing of the Bezuidenhout, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on 3 March 1945 the Royal Air Force accidentally bombed a residential neighbourhood in The Hague, Netherlands, killing 511 people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bombing of the Bezuidenhout.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 07:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Hooliganism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spartak Moscow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
From Skopje to SpeakFree
[edit]Казандиби | |
One Kazandibi for you. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks! SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 10:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Good to see you again, SpeakFree, and thanks for your help. Ongelofelijk dat er nog steeds zo'n Nazi rondloopt. Drmies (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Volgens het artikel is hij al een jaar of 15 dood. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 20:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ik bedoel Klaas Carel Faber. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- BTW, there's a DYK waiting to happen at Koepelgevangenis (Breda)... Drmies (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well he's 90 so won't be walking around much longer. The Dutch article nl:Koepelgevangenis (Breda) is unreferenced so it needs some source finding. Didn't know it is still being used as a prison, seems to be a very old-fashioned prison. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 20:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Monumentenregister De Koepel gevangenis: kerkgebouw. Plus the next two numbers
Night of the Big Wind talk 21:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- On Dutch TV there is a EO documentary about a Liberian war criminal known as General Butt Naked who admitted to kill 20,000 people yet because he suddenly found "The Lord" he can now wash away all his sins and incredibly some of his victims forgave him. I wonder what the International Criminal Court will make of that defense, should he make it to The Hague. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 22:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Monumentenregister De Koepel gevangenis: kerkgebouw. Plus the next two numbers
- Well he's 90 so won't be walking around much longer. The Dutch article nl:Koepelgevangenis (Breda) is unreferenced so it needs some source finding. Didn't know it is still being used as a prison, seems to be a very old-fashioned prison. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 20:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Onterechte unreferenced tags
[edit]Beste SpeakFree,
Mag ik je vragen wat voorzichtiger te zijn met de {{unreferenced}} tags? Sint Maarten status referendum, 1994 heeft namelijk gewoon een (relevante) referentie naar het boek van Gert Oostindie en Sarah Wescot-Williams verwijst naar een nieuwsartikel van de Wereldomroep. Ik heb de tags dan ook verwijderd. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 17:19, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hetzelfde geldt voor Saba status referendum, 2004. Pas een beetje op. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, it would be really cool if you could provide a reference for this (especially as the article lacks decent sourcing already). Cheers, benzband (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks!
benzband (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Photo collage in Computer
[edit]My change was not because of their size or possible bias. It was because it results in a long line of photos that spreads across the entire screen from the far left (even into the non-article, wikipedia bar, going into the "Interaction" section) to the far right, i.e. violating WP:MOSIM. This is related to computer settings and browser. In Explorer 9, you get the long line, except if you manually click to change compatibility settings. They're shown correctly in Firefox. The most widespread browser is still Explorer, so many are likely to see it the way I did. Unfortunately I do not know how to solve this collage problem, but if used, the issue should preferably be solved. RN1970 (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. I thought you were using a mobile device and I had loaded the page on my mobile phone and it looked fine there. I never use Internet Explorer anymore and I just loaded the page in IE9 and saw what happened. The wrap template is obviously not compatible with Microsoft's own
botched"extended" version of HTML. I copied the HTML code used in the previous collage and it looks good now. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 21:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)- Looks good, thanks. RN1970 (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!
We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Please reconsider.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
I invite you back to the article Licht (film). Perhaps you might consider reversing your opinion at the AFD. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Requested user name change on svwp
[edit]Hey Targaryen! We would like to have confirmation that you indeed are the same user who requested a username change to Targaryen on the Swedish Wikipedia. Kindly, Njaelkies Lea (d) 10:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes that's true. My former name is SpeakFree. Please rename that account into Targaryen, with the edit history included. Thanks! Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 16:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Voting at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions
[edit]In response to this edit of yours, please be aware that voting on the motions page is restricted to ArbCom members. This isn't spelled out anywhere, so I understand why someone would not see that right off. But, that is the practice that is held there. You are quite welcome to contribute to discussions of course, but not vote. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK maybe this could be spelt out in order to prevent future confusion. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 00:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- There are enormous holes and general lack of professional approach in ArbCom's various procedures, policies, structure and action. I'm not a member of ArbCom, so I can't do what you suggest. :( --Hammersoft (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Stamas
[edit]Hi! I noticed that you tagged Stamas for deletion as a G1. Please note that G1 only applies to articles with nonsense letters and numbers. I have re-tagged the article as a G3. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Bombing of the Bezuidenhout
[edit]G'day, I have reviewed Bombing of the Bezuidenhout against the GA criteria. The review can be found here: Talk:Bombing of the Bezuidenhout/GA1. Good work on the article so far. I have a number of concerns which I think need to be addressed before it can be promoted, though. As such, when you get a chance, can you please take a look at the review and let me know what you think? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time for looking at the article. I'm currently busy with other things so I don't think I'll be able to address all your points in the next few days. So you can remove the nomination. But I might do that later and then renominate. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 11:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, I've finalised the review now. Good luck with the article in the future. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
[edit]Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Check your Wikipedia email:
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 00:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Good luck, its very handy! The Banner talk 16:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC) formerly NotBW
- Didn't get the code yet but I will soon. BTW are you looking to go on RFA? If succesful The Banner would be a really cool name. Let the Banhammer strike. ;) Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 19:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- As sincere optimist, I don't think I stand a chance on a RFA.
But if you find four people to nominate me, I will give it a go. The Banner talk 23:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'll nominate you. Now go find three others. ;) Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 23:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- As sincere optimist, I don't think I stand a chance on a RFA.
- Didn't get the code yet but I will soon. BTW are you looking to go on RFA? If succesful The Banner would be a really cool name. Let the Banhammer strike. ;) Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 19:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Be Warned - Rangers FC - an attempt to push through a controversial 'same club' approach
[edit]Hello. You have contributed to the Newco Rangers article so I thought yuou should be made aware that an attempt is being made to undermine this article by pushing through a 'same club' approach despite many of us believing this is heavily biased and very selective use of the sources. You may wish to follow what is proposed at the Talk:Rangers F.C/Sandbox. Spiritofstgeorge (talk) 12:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
AFC Backlog
[edit]Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1760 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Your Credo Reference account is approved
[edit]Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
- Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
- If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
- Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
- Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
- If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!
[edit]All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
- If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
- If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
[edit]Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
- Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Your Questia online library codes failed to deliver
[edit]We tried to use Wikipedia email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
ArbitrageCommissie
[edit]LOL, ik heb mij kandidaat gesteld voor de nl-ArbCom. Zoals verwacht ben ik volledig kansloos. Ik zie nu allerlei moderatoren tegenstemmen die er behoorlijk last van zouden hebben wanneer de ArbCom zonder aanziens des persoons, kliekjes en reputaties zou gaan oordelen Ik heb het idee dat men zich collectief rot geschrokken is! Hilarisch. The Banner talk 09:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1760 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
News
|
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1760 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
Replaceable fair use File:TanjaNijmeijer.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:TanjaNijmeijer.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Treinrampschiedam.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Treinrampschiedam.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 13:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)