User talk:Tjepsen

Welcome!

Hello, Tjepsen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Siawase (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Task force

Welcome to the project! Since our focus is on Women's History, you might think about whether we need to set a "prior to" date as part of the focus on your Women in Technology task force. - PKM (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tjepsen, I like the idea of this taskforce. I think the most recent biography I wrote would fit here. JoAnn H. Morgan was an aerospace engineer who was the first woman engineer at Kennedy Space Center. She was involved with designing the rocket launch computer systems for the initial NASA manned flight programs. In published works she talks about her experience being the only female working at Kennedy. She is the type of person who I want us to be sure to include in Wikipedia because she changed the world (at least a little bit) by pushing through the barriers that kept women out of this type of work. So although she is still living I think that we should include her (and women in similar situations) if we can show that they were trailblazers. FloNight ♥♥♥♥ 13:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As far as including living women, we should do that if we focus on the most significant contributions of women in technology from a historical perspective. - PKM (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women in technology

Your proposal is interesting. But does the scope only apply to modern technology? Or should it include the technology of previous eras? For example, would you include Mary Andersonn, inventor of the windshield wiper or Tabitha Babbitt, inventor of circular saws for saw mills? Dimadick (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do think the history of women in technology includes at least some women inventors. I've added some names to the project page, most of them women with engineering degrees/jobs; but some who held patents and designed machinery or processes, and might well have been considered engineers if they lived in another time. I also added a couple women who were pioneers in electronic music. (I haven't added any living women, just to keep it firmly historical for now.) Penny Richards (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Penny Richards[reply]

Thanks for the comments - I absolutely intend to include technology of previous eras - e.g. women in technology in the Renaissance, Enlightenment, early industrial age, later industrial age, early 20th century, Internet age. Inventors of course should be included. Some pages I am currently working on include Mathilde Fibiger, Danish feminist, novelist, and telegrapher, and Ola Delight Smith, American telegrapher, labor organizer, and telegrapher. Question: should we include living persons? Comments welcome. Regards. Tjepsen Tjepsen (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't pay much attention to whether these women still live or not. In many cases the highlights of their respective careers were over thirty years ago and details on them are still historical. I just try to avoid too much "recentism" when I tag articles. Dimadick (talk) 10:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there will be cases where an entry will be in scope in both the Women's History Project and the Women in technology category, and cases where the person's achievements have not yet become "historical" in nature. However, I have no problem with tagging a person with a solid contribution in technology as a member of the Women in technology category, even if they don't fit the requirements of the Women's History Project.Tjepsen (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Fibiger.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Fibiger.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming task force

I renamed the Women In Technology taskforce to Women in technology. It's Wikipedia's convention to use lower case for all words after the first word in article titles, except for proper names. It's no biggie; the renaming creates a redirect, so no one will get lost looking for the taskforce. - PKM (talk) 02:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hi Tjepsen. I just noticed you'd started a new category and was wondering if you'd seen the category discussion over on the WikiProject's page. We're considering creating categories according to country and I've proposed breaking those categories down further into nationality, then occupation. Hopefully the categorization will help to narrow this taskforce's scope. Please do let us know what you think. mheart (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women's History

WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 10:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Commercial Telegraphers Union of America

On 20 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Commercial Telegraphers Union of America, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1916, members who attempted to remove a "whites only" clause from the constitution of the Commercial Telegraphers Union of America were accused of "fomenting socialism"? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

It's a good article. Keep it up in the article creation, we always need good contributers in the history field (it's sad what some of the history core topic pages look like, maybe you will want to take a shot at some of those)!Sadads (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Members' input needed at WikiProject Women's History

Hello. I'm writing to you as your name is listed on the members page for WikiProject Women's History. In recent discussions at the project, most notably here, several members have indicated that the scope of the project may need to be more clearly defined and communicated. I have set up a workshop page for this, but it obviously needs as wide a participation as possible to achieve genuine consensus and to allow the project to move forward. You'll find the workshop here.

If you no longer consider yourself an active member of the project, it would help if you could indicate this on the members' page. This will allow us to better gauge how much people-power we actually have. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tjepsen/Juliana Rotich has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Juliana Rotich, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Juliana Rotich. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Juliana Rotich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tjepsen/Emilie Kempin-Spyri has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emilie Kempin-Spyri, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Emilie Kempin-Spyri, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Altstetten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tjepsen/Gladys Kathleen Parkin has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gladys Kathleen Parkin, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tjepsen/Mary Macaulay has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mary Macaulay, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Macaulay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gladys Kathleen Parkin.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mary Macaulay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages LeRoy, New York and Lyons, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=22153291 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Women in early radio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shearonink (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tjepsen/Women in the telegraph industry has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Women in the telegraph industry, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Women in the telegraph industry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 17:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate

You are invited to participate in a dialogue at Tedder's talk page, to help enlarge and/or refine search terms for the Women's History new articles search rules.Maile66 (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join WikiProject Women writers

Hello Tjepsen! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tjepsen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert R. Rich (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs independent sources - please read Wikipedia:Independent sources. His wife and children are not "Awards and honors".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert R. Rich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert R. Rich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tjepsen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]