You have been blockedindefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have understood the reason behind blocking of page: Xprtin, and hereby I agree that I won't be writing any page henceforth that would involve advertising my business. My mistake was linking the weblink of my website on the name of business, (which now I understood that, this is not right, after reading all the different policies associated with blocking of pages). Now on before posting any article or page, i will be posting over Sandbox as advised by Wikipedia. Also, take recommendation for choosing an appropriate name for page so that I don't violate any of the policies of Wikipedia. I hereby request you to grant me permission to edit and remove all the violated material from page.
Decline reason:
Your unblock request does not give me any confidence that you actually understand the reason for the block: if you really think that your only "mistake" was linking to your website then you have missed the point. Also, your strange comment about "choosing an appropriate name for page" gives the impression that you think promotional editing is acceptable as long as it is done under a suitable title. I suggest that you carefully re-read the section of the block notice beginning "If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than..." because your present unblock request does not do what is described there. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am just trying to remove the article that has been posted. For doing so, I wanted to unblock, so that the article posted in name of Xprtin can be removed. I have read the policy, that Wikipedia is not a site for business promotion. I have agreed to the mistake mentioned which was one of the reason, that I wanted to highlight. My only request is to remove the article with named Xprtin and I don't want to add or modify any further information.
