Talk:10,000 Hours (film)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Iffy in topic Requested move 15 January 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 10,000 Hours (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 15 January 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. There is a consensus below that the song is now the primary topic for 10,000 Hours. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 10:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
– With the release of 10,000 Hours (song), this film is no longer the dominant meaning of this term, if it even was before. Korny O'Near (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support no clear primary topic given the 2019 song and noting that this isn't that old (2013). The song gets over 28x the views (22,216) of the film (792) [[1]] despite the film being at the base name. There are also several other DABMENTIONs on the DAB to. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support - no clear primary. -- Netoholic @ 11:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support first, oppose second. Move 10,000 Hours (song) to basename. Using Crouch, Swale's link, we see that the song article gets 97% of pageviews. Even with a drop-off, the song article is a clear winner by usage, and also by significance. Dohn joe (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support, no primary topic. A longer-term view [2] of those pageviews shows the song being a very recent phenomenon. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but even using your graph over 4 years, the song article still gets over 50% of pageviews, even though it didn't exist until October. The song article is incredibly sought-after now - if the article popularity crashes for some reason later, we can adjust. But for now, this is the article our readers are after. Dohn joe (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Now I'm not sure any more, but I'm leaning toward this view, of going with the original suggested moves. The book that seems to have inspired the title of most of these entries, Outliers (book), dominates the page views, getting 50% more than the song at its peak. That book covered a lot of ground, but the "10,000-hour rule" was a big theme in it. Korny O'Near (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but even using your graph over 4 years, the song article still gets over 50% of pageviews, even though it didn't exist until October. The song article is incredibly sought-after now - if the article popularity crashes for some reason later, we can adjust. But for now, this is the article our readers are after. Dohn joe (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support Dohn joe's alternative. The stats trump a "recentism" argument in this case. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support Dohn joe's alternative per the above. It is implausible that the song will be derailed as primary topic by any other meaning. BD2412 T 04:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.