Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Italicized title
editWhy is the title italicized? It's not some studio album. Parsley Man (talk) 02:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Manson Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607180026/http://www.beausoleil.net:80/mminterview.html to http://www.beausoleil.net/mminterview.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513131337/http://www.truthontatelabianca.com/threads/monfort-posed-as-willett.1429/ to http://www.truthontatelabianca.com/threads/monfort-posed-as-willett.1429/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Mendocino County section needed
editCharlie sent an advance party to Mendoland with an eye to moving the Family there; he was also arrested there in 1967. Members of The Family were busted there on drug felonies, and later were suspects in double murder there of Clyda Dulaney and Nancy Warren on 13 October 1968, as can be seen in Websleuths.com and verified in their sources.
Son Valentine
editHis son was named Valentine Michael. This is the name of the antagonist of Heinlin's Stranger in a Strange Land, a re-telling of the story of the Christ. Is this relevant? GreaseballNYC (talk) 06:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Susan Atkins
editWhat was that line about her defecating in the stairwell all about? Was her crime not offensive enough without us knowing that little tidbit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.39.234.59 (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Watermelon Rinds
editSome reports of the murders claim that watermelon rinds were left at the murder scenes in order to frame black people, is there anything about this to the article or is just a legend?101.174.197.246 (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say it's a legend. They were fairly disorganized criminals.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Manson Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070309154239/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansonbeatles.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansonbeatles.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070320085827/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansontestimony-w.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansontestimony-w.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tate murders which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
"Alternative theories" section
editI don't think the "copycat theory" warrants inclusion in the article. It was put forward by several Manson Family members as an attempt to exonerate Manson himself during the penalty phase of his trial, and was never taken seriously by the jury or anyone else, as it did not fit with any of the evidence, or make internal sense. The Manson girls later confirmed the Helter Skelter explanation (for instance, in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn2zULFwB_w#t=4m15s). To me, it seems like including it in the article appears to lend credibility to an attempt at misdirection that was never taken seriously. 68.43.7.151 (talk) 04:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- You are incorrect as it was the theory most believed in by the police and other prosecutors Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Where I think you may be confused is that even though Helter Skelter was most likely something Manson rambled about and possibly believed in, there is major discrepancy as to whether or not it was the motive. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Unreliable source
editAn unreliable source, http://www.aboundinglove.org/, has been added repeatedly to this article. Any objection to removing it? Magnolia677 (talk) 10:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Gregg Jakobson
editIn what sense would Jakobson be a member of the "Manson Family cult" as it is claimed in the article? In the article on Jakobson it only says that he was a friend of Manson. That wouldn't automatically make him a cult member. --Bernardoni (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
"Comprehensive list"
editThe lead states that the group consisted of approximately 100 followers
while the section "Confirmed members and associates" states The following is a comprehensive list of individuals associated with the Manson Family cult
, but lists only 32 people. Presumably the list is not comprehensive, but is either *confirmed* persons or persons who have some degree of notability (not defined). This needs to be addressed? --LukeSurl t c 13:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Neo-Nazism?
editIs there a source for his supposed Neo-Nazism? --Amakuha (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- His forehead, I suppose. signed, Willondon (talk) 21:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- His forehead is not a reliable source.
- I don't know about the US, but in ex-Soviet Union, at least, prisoners often made swastika tattoos as a symbol of "resistance to authority". It's a long way from the actual neo-Nazism. --Amakuha (talk) 02:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Moreover, his swastika tattoo appeared only when he was already in prison, so I don't see how the family could be a "neo-Nazi organization" based on the tattoo alone. --Amakuha (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)