Talk:Max Mosley/GA1

GA Review

I will review this article. I have familiarized myself with its recent GAR discussion. Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 18:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

First Review by Robert Skyhawk

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I have reviewed this article, and it appears to meet the Criteria for Good articles.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   I am impressed by the thoroughness of the citiations for quotes especially.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Again, this article definitely meets the criteria in my opinion. The issue about the Nazi organization which was raised during its reassessment seems to be resolved. Congratulations to User:4u1e and all other involved editors. I will now proceed to take all necessary steps to award this article GA status. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 20:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Many have contributed, but Tommy turrell is the other major contributor. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. 4u1e (talk) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)