Talk:Amica Mutual Insurance
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 196.191.177.127 in topic amica insurance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Amica Mutual Insurance/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I have rated this article a stub for the WikiProject Finance because it is entirely lacking in references and needs more detail... looks close to being a start though. --Aka042 (talk) 01:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 01:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Edit requested on 28 December 2016
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
We've adequately addressed some of the issues on the page by adding new references and updating information. How does the community feel about removing some or all of those flags/warnings? Thank you Michael Michael McCann6 (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'd like to see a few more inline citations, especially for the sentences that currently lack one. For example, how do we know that Amica is the oldest mutual insurer of cars in the U.S.? Ideally, they should be from independent sources, i.e. reports that have no connection to Amica. Currently, the article only has two references, and one is to Amica's website. Best, Altamel (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
amica insurance
editIs a good insurance 196.191.177.127 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)