This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Some of the content was under Collusion which actually related to audit quality. I dont think the poor audit quality and ethical issues related to these firms was necessarily "colluding". They were simply getting away with poor quality audit work which is what they were hired to do in the first place to protect the interests of Investors and other stakeholders. Given the number of fines and regulatory actions against all of them including settlements I believe it is more appropriate to deal with these in a separate section.
The edits are still work in progress but please feel free to comment here or on my talk page.
Would welcome other editors to add and expand and also clean up the article a bit - it is a bit verbose and disconnected at places and there are good suggestions above by other editors that have not yet been implemented.WikiCpa (talk) 08:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
I should mention that I did go and clean up the section a bit, and also added examples of poor audit quality / ethics from all 4 firms, so that the article does not seem biased against any one firm (e.g. there is a lot of recency bias on KPMG with Carillion, and on EY with Wirecard). CDB-Man (talk) 23:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Start a discussion about improving the Big Four accounting firms page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Big Four accounting firms" page.