[go: nahoru, domu]

Talk:Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeCobb Energy Performing Arts Centre was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Failed "good article" nomination

edit

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of November 12, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: FAIL - Minor grammatical errors. The article is not well organized (e.g. location and proximity to public transportation are mentioned in the "Design" section). Additionally, lead section does not act as an introduction to and summation of the article. Reorganization and inclusion of, perhaps, a location section, would help remedy the problem.
2. Factually accurate?: PASS – There may, however, be concern that the majority of sources are from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Perhaps other sources could be utilized to both expand the article and provide more solid support.
3. Broad in coverage?: FAIL - A design section and gallery do not appear to adequately address a notable performing arts center. One reference, after all, is entitled "Arts center concept falls short in execution". At the very least, an additional section addressing critical response to the structure seems warranted.
4. Neutral point of view?: FAIL - Article appears, at times, to have been written from a promotional standpoint (e.g. "grand alabaster staircase", "visitors are greeted by", "...evoke the glass art", etc.)
5. Article stability? PASS
6. Images?: FAIL – Relatively minor concerns: “main” picture of the structure does not have a caption; “façade” image does not appear to contribute anything beyond “main” picture.

The article is off to a reasonable start. I would, however, characterize it as a rudimentary start-class article, as the information seems sparse and disorganized.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Elcobbola 20:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply