Talk:Destination: Skaro/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 08:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 09:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this one. I need more points for the wikicup and also it would benefit my WikiProject and a frequent collaborator. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 09:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
General
edit- Earwig spots nothing suspicious
- Images need alt text.
Done
Lead
edit- You should try to avoid citations in the lead, however in this case its alright given the context of is use.
- It doenst seem like Destination Skaro was met with mixed reception just the change to Davros.
Done
Plot
editlooks good
Production
edit- The source claims that the minisode takes place prior to Genisis of the Daleks. Not simultaneously
Done
- Link the lines about Davies being executive producer and Vicky Delow and Scott Handcock regular producers.
Done
- This one is up to you but the plunger bit received a little bit of coverage, see here [1][2][3]
Done
- It states that Julian Bleach reprised his role as Davros, but given that there have been multiple davros actors, it may be worth listing which episodes he previously appeared in.
Done-ish, I mentioned the year rather this list all of the episode
- It might be worth noting chronology in relation to Power of the Doctor as that was the most recent TV episode of at the time. It is noted in the plot summary but not by name so
Done
Broadcast and reception
edit- Break up the sections about release and reception into two separate paragraphs.
Done
- Tell me about the reliabilty of nerdgazam.
Done
- Doctor Who TV.uk isn't really the best fan site.
Done (replaced)
- It doenst seem like Destination Skaro was met with mixed reception just the change to Davros. I would suggest slightly tweaking the wording.
Done
Response
edit@OlifanofmrTennant: I know you're still working through it, but I fixed the first two issues. As for Nerdgazm, we have transparency in authorship and a clear editorial policy that explains its content policy which falls in line with WP:INDEPENDENT. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Hey there, it's been nearly two weeks. Just checking to see if this is something you're still working on?
TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh yeah sorry, I was drafting up some notes before I lost access to my primary computer for a weekish because some incompetent fool spilled water over it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, there's no rush. Just wanted to double check. Rumor has it that computers also need hydration sometimes. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @TheDoctorWho: done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @OlifanofmrTennant: I believe I've addressed everything! TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @TheDoctorWho: done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, there's no rush. Just wanted to double check. Rumor has it that computers also need hydration sometimes. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh yeah sorry, I was drafting up some notes before I lost access to my primary computer for a weekish because some incompetent fool spilled water over it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)