This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2022 and 2024.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Various criticisms of the show are covered in the "Reception" section. However, one thing to note is that while yes, this show is very controversial, a lot of the outcry against it just comes from people on social media, not independent reliable sources. That's why there might not be as many negative notations in the reception section. Blubewwy (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
This seems like Wikipedias rules are being a roadblock to its goal as an encyclopaedia. The negative reactions to the show are obviously notable due to their scale and commonality, but due to not being covered in mainstream reliable sources and rather being relegated to social media there is no way to mention them in the article. To not do so is doing our readers a disservice, as criticism of the show is some of the most frequent and widespread discussion of it in the internet circles where the show originated.
I mean, we're not going to include tweets and facebook posts. Yes, the show is extremely controversial, almost by design. But we still need reliable secondary sources. GMGtalk13:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Mention of the show's controversial nature just do not need to be included if it's not discussed in secondary sources. No matter how many people speak on how they dislike it, it's just not worth putting it into the article if this widespread dislike never makes it any further than Twitter or Facebook. Blubewwy (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. There are many varied perspectives already in response to the series from reliable sources (I counted a total of ten for pilot reception section and twelve for the series reception section, not including metacritic and rotten tomatoes). That's already a LOT more than many other series. I agree that citing Twitter or Facebook for opinions on the series would be utterly worthless. As such, I would say that the views by FizzleDrunk and Oixyplanet on this are misplaced. Historyday01 (talk) 21:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Semi-protected edit request: Hazbin Hotel renewed for Seasons 3 & 4
