Talk:LG Uplus

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move Request

Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

LG Uplus → LG U+ – The company is called "LG U+" not "Lg Uplus". The official logo along with all official literature and third-party articles (i.e. WP:COMMONNAME) referring to the company, reflect this. "LG U+" returns 16,700,000 results on Google while "LG Uplus" returns 678,000 results. Relisted. BDD (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 「gu1dry」⊤ • ¢ 03:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comment: Per WP:COMMONAME, article titles are normally based on the most common name used by reliable sources, not the official name. The official logo and all official literature and articles that are produced by the company are completely irrelevant. See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks, which states that Wikipedia articles should follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of trademark owners. Unless most third-party reliable sources use "U+" instead of "Uplus", the current article title should stand. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
- When I said "articles' I was referring to third-party sources. I have update the original request to clarify this. BTW I know how move requests work, this isn't my first rodeo... 「gu1dry」⊤ • ¢ 05:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oppose use LG U-Plus or LG U-plus per MOS:TM (♥ used for "love") ; LG U plus and LG U + should all redirect here. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Strong support, because "+" is pronounced "plus" and is the most common way of doing so in English. Red Slash 16:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose ′Copyright 2012 LG Uplus Corp. All Rights Reserved.′ is written at the bottom on the official website. Korea Exchange uses ′LG Uplus′ KRX: 032640 [1]. So ′LG Uplus′ is the official name and the common name. The official logo expresses LG U⁺, not LG U+. Should move to LG U⁺? Sawol (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic