Talk:Laurie Hernandez
 | Laurie Hernandez is currently a Other sports good article nominee. Nominated by Riley1012 (talk) at 19:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: American artistic gymnast |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tarynmarie1127.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Suggestions
editI would like to make a few suggestions for this article. My first suggestion is to add more information about her time in Rio. That section could be more in depth and provide more information about how Hernandez contributed to winning the Team Finals Gold medal. For example, her scores could be listed. My second suggestion goes along with my first. In addition to having her scores from each night she competed it could be beneficial to explain what each night of competition was for her. For example, how she did on the night of qualifications or how she did on the night of team finals. There should be more listed than just the date of her scores. My third suggestion is to try to stay away from the sources could be perceived as bias. While the article itself is not bias some of the sources could be considered bias because they are from magazines and blogs. Tarynmarie1127 (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Tarynmarie1127
Laurie has released the duet, Friend on 27 November 2020, with songwriter and producer, Josh Del — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodedwiki (talk • contribs) 18:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Laurie Hernandez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 14:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
| 2c. it contains no original research. | ||
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
| 7. Overall assessment. | ||
Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)