[go: nahoru, domu]

Talk:The Watch (2012 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Darkwarriorblake in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miniapolis (talk · contribs) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Over-citation?

edit

In copyediting the article, I noticed four citations in a row for Ben Stiller's character in the "Cast" section. Per WP:OVERCITE#How to trim excessive citations, perhaps the least-valuable reference should be removed (I find more than three footnotes in a row to be clutter). All the best, Miniapolis (talk) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look when you're finished copy editing, I don't want to cause you an edit conflict. I think the problem was each source carried a part of the info but not all, but I'll double check. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Done . Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: