This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
In Medieval times the throne of Solomon was associated with Mary. The ivory of the throne represented purity, the gold represented divinity and the six steps of the throne stood for the six virtues. There's that "passive of attribution" again. A quote would lend weight and color to such a statement. Without it, this sounds like the "Language of the Flowers." Wetman 03:02, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:GestatorialChair1.jpg
editThe image Image:GestatorialChair1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Altar-and-throne
editThe article mentions ecclesiastical thrones, but it should also mention the expression altar-and-throne, which is the name given to the pre-Revolutionary regimes in Catholic Europe, which were characterized by a close collaboration between the royalty and the papacy, such as in the Holy Roman Empire. (cf [1]) ADM (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
A Throne is a seat of state,the seat is occupied by a king or queen with color and several gems and stones — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.72.184.169 (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Empty "Islam" section
editThe section heading "Throne" "Islam" has been completely empty, except for a link to Al-Baqara 255, since this edit in 2011, more than six years ago. There's no reason for the empty section to have persisted for this long. If there is no objection, I am going to delete this empty section and will move the link to the "See also" heading. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Good idea. Johnbod (talk) 09:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response. Done. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 02:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)