Jonxwood
Your edits to Joseph Medill Patterson
editThanks, Jonxwood, for your edits. One minor point: his only son, James Joseph Patterson, was born out of wedlock to Joseph Medill Patterson's mistress, whom he later married. Also you spelled wife "wive". Whether it should be explicitly stated that she was his mistress or not, stating that it was his wife is not correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by History amateur (talk • contribs) 20:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Your edits to Mount Pleasant, Washington, D.C.
editHi, Jonxwood. I'm dropping you a note to tell you that I've just reverted a series of edits you made to Mount Pleasant, Washington, D.C.. I explained my thinking on the talk page there, and I thought to drop you a note so that you wouldn't be discouraged by what appears to be a wholesale rejection of your work. It's not intended as such. The gist of it was that while I thought you had a lot of good ideas in the edits, the final product had several glitches in it that would be pretty difficult and time-consuming to clean up - little grammatical errors like apostrophes in plurals, non-Wiki-style links, and a few other things. The other problem is that because you edited so many parts of the article pretty much at once, it's very difficult to compare the old version to the new one to see how they compare substantively. Other editors may disagree with what I did, and change it right back; but if not then what I plan to do is take a look at your changes and try to work some or most of them one or two at a time so that the other editors can see what I'm doing, and can more easily undo individual changes that they may not agree with. You seem to have a good sense of how to organize an article - my only two suggestions would be to look hard at what you have done, using the preview function, to make sure your new text is clean; and make changes a bit more incrementally. Good luck! JohnInDC (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome! About Carl Sandburg
edit
|
One specific remark I want to add is about your edits in Carl Sandburg. I stumbled upon this article just a few minutes ago and saw it didn't have a lead. Immediately, I thought I would add one and I did. It was only afterwards that I took a look at the article history. I didn't really scrutinize your edits, but you seem to have done a good job. It is only conventional to have a lead section. You know more about Sandburg than I do, which is what I read in the article really. So if you take a look at the Wikipedia:Lead section guidelines, you can probably do a better job than I did. --Atavi (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Vieques, Puerto Rico has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 07:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
About show preview
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Katr67 (talk) 06:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
About edit summaries
editHi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.
Jean Tatlock
editPlease meet me at Talk:Jean Tatlock for a quick discussion. - 4.240.165.183 (talk) 21:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Dixie Mission
editI have conducted a reassessment of this article and found several unreferenced statements which need addressing. Details at Talk:Dixie Mission/GA1. The reassessment is on hold for seven days after which it may be delisted if it does not meet the GA criteria. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Wayne, New Jersey
edit Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with this edit to Wayne, New Jersey, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewett W. Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Nevada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Signing your posts
editI note that your signature in this edit at the Talk: Alpena News used four tildes, but broke them apart. Put them together in on expresion, and the software will sign it for you and put in a link to your talk page. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Signing posts
editThank you, 7+6=13, I hope I've got it.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Goldsborough (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page York High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Jonxwood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Jonxwood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Jonxwood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)