[go: nahoru, domu]

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
  •   Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
  •   Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Holiday Greetings

edit
 
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. Always a pleasure to see your work. ―Buster7 

Your GA nomination of Ernie Shore

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ernie Shore you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion

edit

ArielR20130725 (talk · contribs) is a clear sock of 108.41.40.6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Yankees10 21:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yankees10, they should have been warned. I warned them. We encourage IPs to register accounts so I think they need more appropriate warnings for a block. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit

Your GA nomination of Ernie Shore

edit

The article Ernie Shore you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Ernie Shore for comments about the article, and Talk:Ernie Shore/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mark Hutton

edit

On 5 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Hutton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mark Hutton was the first Australian to be a starting pitcher in a Major League Baseball game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Hutton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Hutton), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

added 
removed 

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


Thanks!

edit
A Barnstar! 
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!

You scored 102 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this cleanup barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Ken Goldin

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Ken Goldin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 19:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Presidency Navigation Templates vs. Biography Navigation Templates discussion

edit

Hello, Muboshgu! Since you are listed as an active member of the United States Presidents WikiProject, would you mind leaving a comment at a project talk page discussion about a series of templates that I created for the presidencies of Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush? Another editor and myself disagree about whether there should be a separate navigation template for each Presidency apart from the biographical navigation template. Thanks! -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
7 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Oklahoma District Attorneys Council (talk) Add sources
745 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Survivor (band) (talk) Add sources
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Emicho (talk) Add sources
490 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Sonny Corleone (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Ann M. McDonough (talk) Add sources
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Acadia University (talk) Add sources
597 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  George Mason University (talk) Cleanup
108 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Cameron Maybin (talk) Cleanup
78 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Louisville Metro Police Department (talk) Cleanup
7,576 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries (talk) Expand
4,923 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA  Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign (talk) Expand
163 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA  Aftermath of the January 6 United States Capitol attack (talk) Expand
876 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,770 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Mayonnaise (talk) Unencyclopaedic
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Steve Glazer (talk) Unencyclopaedic
401 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA  Asa Hutchinson (talk) Merge
72 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA  Boston Red Sox minor league players (talk) Merge
94 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Challengers of the Unknown (talk) Merge
45 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA  Hudson River Derby (talk) Wikify
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Justin Grimm (talk) Wikify
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Jimmy Stewart (baseball) (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA  David Duke 1992 presidential campaign (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Saletti (Atessa) (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Majid Qodiri (talk) Orphan
90 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Héctor Ramos (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Erindale Secondary School (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Barber, California (talk) Stub
62 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  2010 Arkansas gubernatorial election (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Andrew Barbosa (talk) Stub
104 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  GPU-Z (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Project 2025

edit

Hello - thanks at least for labeling my edits "good faith"; they are.

My question is: if a different Republican nominee were to win the November 2024 election - would Project 2025's planks, recommendations, etc., be different? I imagine not, and their website makes no reference to President Trump. These are among the reasons I think simply saying "the Republican" or "conservative" nominee in the lede makes more sense.

Best,

Kaisershatner (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kaisershatner, your edit was clearly good faith and not enough editors here assume that. You ask an interesting question that I do not know the answer to. You may well be right. Of course, it's Trump allies who are behind it and it is their plan for Trump to be president as they execute it. This question would be better asked on the article's talk page so others can more easily see it and engage. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi - just saw this, and again, thanks.
I have edited on the talk page as well and will take this there. Presuming NPOV as a first principle - the article comes up short, whatever WP:Consensus currently is. However I will respect the process and will note that there. As the editor who reverted me, I'd appreciate your directly reply there as well, if amenable.
Best,
Kaisershatner (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Question about Project 2025 article

edit

Hi. Recently a user put this at the beginning of the Project 2025 article: Not to be confused with Donald Trump's package of proposals, Agenda 47.[1]

Do you think it should be reverted by WP:NPOV? It seems like an attempt to unlink Trump from the 2025 project with the endorsement of Wikipedia. This is even more controversial considering that the Trump campaign initially said that Project 2025 aligned well with its Agenda 47 proposals.[2] Additionally, there is no evidence that there is a common confusion between the two terms. They don't even have similar names, and little or nothing has been said or mentioned about agenda 47.

I'm asking you this because you are a very important user on Wikipedia and also because you have made reversals in the Project 2025 article about WP:NPOV. Esterau16 (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Esterau16, I had not heard of Agenda 47. This is again a subject better discussed on the article's talk page rather than mine. I haven't checked it in a few hours to know if you have or not. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

2nd game of a DH

edit

For the 2nd game of a DH, when adding the 27th player, it would make sense to DO a (2nd game) note for that date only. I don't see why there is any problem, as long as there is no error made. And there was no error, to use a BB term. Just because it "isn't done" doesn't mean it is forbidden by the rules. Lighten up already, and let more info be allowed! MondayMonday1966 (talk) 01:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

MondayMonday1966, it isn't a matter of me needing to "lighten up". It's a matter of following WP:DATEFORMAT. Your previous edit confused another user. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
And then I fixed it after seeing the problem. Only after that (one minute) you removed it Get the whole story straight, not just the partial storyline that you didn't say. Sorry for the initial mistake, but after I fixed it, you should have let it go. After that 2nd game and he was no longer active, I would then put him back on the inactive roster. I've done that before, and with the correction I made, it makes sense to do that to show it is in the middle of the two games on the same day, for accuracy. MondayMonday1966 (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jenny Cavnar

edit

She not gonna let you hit bro Kyūka96 (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kyūka96, if you make one more unconstructive edit, like the one you made on my talk page, I will block you. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Move of Trump article

edit

Hi there, FYI when you moved the Trump article at 22:57, it was move-protected (sysops only) due to move-warring since 22:52 (duration then changed 22:53). No comment on the actual move itself but in terms of editing/moving through sysop-only protection, I wasn't sure if you were aware the protection existed at the time (everything is moving very quickly so I'm assuming you may not have realised it was protected). Cheers, Daniel (talk) 23:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I did not, thanks for lettin me know. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
All good, suspected this was the case. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply