Schierbecker
| This is Schierbecker's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
edit- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
edit- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
WikiProject
editHi, I see you've contributed a lot to Nyami Nyami, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
I saw the tag you added - I'll fix that before the TFA but it'll be several days before I get the chance. Hog Farm Talk 02:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- User:Hog Farm, thanks. I recently visited Fort Davidson (also stealth camped inside the earthworks of the fort). I was surprised from reading the Battle of Glasgow article that the Confederates regarded Pilot Knob as a loss? I've never read explicitly otherwise, but I did know that Price very deludedly thought the campaign as a whole was an outstanding success. Schierbecker (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Does this resolve your concern with the lack of clarity? I've visited Fort Davidson myself, but it's been a couple years. The battle article is on my list of things to try to bring to FA eventually. The battle is considered to be a Confederate defeat due to the lopsided casualties and the later effects it had on Price's campaign. Hog Farm Talk 23:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it does. Thanks. Schierbecker (talk) 02:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Does this resolve your concern with the lack of clarity? I've visited Fort Davidson myself, but it's been a couple years. The battle article is on my list of things to try to bring to FA eventually. The battle is considered to be a Confederate defeat due to the lopsided casualties and the later effects it had on Price's campaign. Hog Farm Talk 23:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
edit- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
edit| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
editNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)