Pearman2
Welcome!
edit
|
January 2023
edit Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rush!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 02:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
edit Hello, I'm CurryTime7-24. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sergei Prokofiev have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please discuss and seek consensus on talk pages before adding an infobox to a composer article. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
my daily stories |
- Sadly, Pearman2, we live in a project where some users still think that an infobox (for a composer) is an experiment, and not constructive. I disagree, and recommend you take it to the talk page. For some years, I have been quiet, but among my New Year's resolutions was that it has to stop. See Beethoven, where an infobox was installed in 2015 by an arbitrator as the result of a community consensus, and on the other hand Mozart, Chopin and now Prokofiev. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Pearman2! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Storm (Tchaikovsky) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Houses of the Holy. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José María Guido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veinticinco de Mayo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreliable sourcing
edit Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited If I Had a Hammer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
edit Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Chicken Dance, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A Hard Day's Night (song). - FlightTime (open channel) 01:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linda (Miguel Bosé song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
edit Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Andrew Tate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
This list (and others for different years) are all cited to the same source which appears to not mention Peru at all. Would you mind explaining where you got the information for the list from? Mach61 06:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Pearman2. Thank you for your work on Su di noi. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this page, and happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Cosa farai moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Cosa farai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of number-one hits of 1962 (Peru) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one hits of 1962 (Peru) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.