Piedmont
Welcome!
Hello, Piedmont, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Secundus
editYour change is great! Makes a lot more sense than the original text. Thanks! --Polylerus (talk) 20:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Monferrato Arte website
editGood to see your name appearing again on my watchlist: I hope to see it very frequently!
With regard to this edit to Province of Asti, though, I wonder whether you looked at the site (which is a brilliant resource of solid information about the localities of the ‘Monferrato Casalese’ and their churches), or at the article Diocese of Casale, which lists the twenty or so parishes which fall within the Province of Asti? They include places of such historical importance as Moncalvo: articles such as that would be enormously useful to people working up the wikipedia articles on places in the province. Ian Spackman (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes I do see your point. Though now I think of it, logically it doesn’t really belong to any of the province pages: ideally it should be on the page for the Diocese, and links to the appropriate entry in the directory should be there for each of the communes and one or two other pages, such as the Sacro Monte di Crea. That way anyone wanting to do work on one of the pages, or just read more about the subject, would have the link ready. But that just seems too much work, and we can’t ask the anon who has been adding the link to do it, because he always arrives from a different IP address. It would be simpler if the Province of Casale hadn’t been suppressed—or if it had been reinstated at the same time as the Province of Asti!
Maybe the best compromise would be to add it to the individual commune pages in the case of AT and TO, while leaving it in the pages for AL and the diocese. What do you think? Ian Spackman (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Also worth adding to some of the local artists, now I think of it: Moncalvo and his daughters, for instance. Ian Spackman (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Important Wine Project discussion needs input!
editHello, the Wine Project is currently in the process of hammering out a proposed policy relating to Wikipedia:Notability (wine topics). As Wikipedia and its wine coverage continues to grow, the need for a clear, concise guideline on how Wikipedia's notability policies such as WP:CORP, WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTE relate to wine articles has emerged. Please review the proposed policy and take part in the talk page discussion Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(wine_topics)#Ready_to_go_live.3F. All input and view points are welcomed. AgneCheese/Wine 21:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Palio di Asti
editPiedmont, what do mean when you say "In 1992 the Palio di Asti was combined with the national lottery."? This is on the Palio di Asti page. The national lottery of Italy appears to be Lotto and SuperEnalotto. How could this be combined with the Palio di Asti? Do you mean that betting on the Palio di Asti is administered by the same agency that runs the national lottery? Thanks! AugieWest (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ChefMoz2
edit Template:ChefMoz2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:ChefMoz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
St Peter's
editThank you for your correction! Amandajm (talk) 04:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Palio di Asti - historical sources
editHello Piedmont I've just read about the Palio, I guess that much of it is your own work, especially the historical notes. I am extremely interested in the fact that races were also recorded in the Carolingian and Langobard periods (under the Latin name "curricula"), could you quote your sources? This seems to be a matter of historical significance. The texts listed in the page are old and difficult to find... isn't there more recent research? Thanks, Alberto
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nizza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that was a mistake, which I have now corrected. Piedmont (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
editHi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Piedmont. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Karl Leimer) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Karl Leimer, Piedmont!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Piedmont. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Piedmont. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
References
editThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
- Then click on "templates",
- Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
- If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- A very patronizing contribution from this fellow editor. You would not guess from his well-rehearsed boilerplate text, in which he tries to teach me how to edit Wikipedia, that I have been an editor here for longer than him! Piedmont (talk) 09:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editCourtesy notice - Sanctions for articles related to COVID-19 and recent US politics
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.