User talk:RA0808/Archives2013/November

Peak 10

Thank you for restoring this page. I was trying to delete a page in my "sandbox" but apparently doing that deleted the Peak 10 page. Is there a way to delete the page from my sandbox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joann Wieland (talk • contribs) 17:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I'd be happy to take a look into what may have happened, could I have a link to the sandbox page in question? RA0808 ^talk_contribs 17:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

About deletion of Article "International Roaming Biennial of Tehran"

I'v deleted this article because it is misleading people. Lot of people who are searching for Any "International Roaming facility and method by perspective of Mobile Computing" gets redirected on that page.That page/article must be with another header instead of "International Roaming Biennial of Tehran".

And even wikipedia says "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations". Please revert the changes what you have did on that page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.129.58 (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually, searching for "international roaming" on Wikipedia redirects to the article Roaming which begins: "In wireless telecommunications, roaming is a general term referring to the extension of connectivity service in a location that is different from the home location where the service was registered. Roaming ensures that the wireless device is kept connected to the network, without losing the connection". The name is not misleading in any way, the only disruption is being caused by your disruptive pattern of edits.

In addition to the blanking of the page, placing a {{db-g7}} tag on an article which you yourself did not create is vandalism since G7 tags can only be placed by "the author of the only substantial content".

Please refrain from such non-constructive edits in the future or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

RE: Undergraduate research Page

Hi there!

This article was created as a project for a university class in Northern New York. You made a comment on our page about it being written like a personal reflection or opinion essay and we just wanted to get some clarification on what you meant, and how to fix it. Thanks for your edit!

Honorkid197 (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

The main issue that shows when I read through the article is the repeated use of "According to ______". Statements like that are not in keeping with the encyclopedic tone of Wikipedia, and I am noting a degree of synthesis in parts of the article. I would advise you to take a look at some existing Wikipedia articles to get a feel for the tone that the project strives for. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)