[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 June 25

< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion‎ | Log
< June 24 June 26 >

June 25

edit

Category:Irisbus

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Iveco vehicles and Category:Iveco as needed.--Mike Selinker (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:SMALLCAT. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:33, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Abstraction

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Vague. Over-categorization. Pointless Brad7777 (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Interdisciplinary fields

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for now. The Bushranger One ping only 01:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not notable. Over-categorization. Brad7777 (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dangerous Road for Pedestrians

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete hopelessly subjective and unlikely to be defining since roads are not designed to be safe for pedestrians. Pichpich (talk) 17:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Luther Rice Seminary alumni

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. The Bushranger One ping only 17:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge we have a single main article under the title Luther Rice University (to which Luther Rice Seminary redirects) so I propose keeping all alumni in a single category. Pichpich (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Albums produced by Hangmen 3

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete Per precedent, we usually require multiple solo production credits to create such a category. In this case, Hangmen 3 (aka Benzino) only has partial producer credits on his own albums. Pichpich (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chemistry prefixes and suffixes

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Chemical nomenclature. The Bushranger One ping only 01:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improvement to the grammar Brad7777 (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Teachable units for language instruction

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains 4 articles. Seems to have been unused since 2009, and I'm not very clear as to if it will grow as there is no eponymous article. Brad7777 (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bird terminology

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 17:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improvement to the grammar. Brad7777 (talk) 14:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Retain the broad scope. My problem is only one of grammar. Brad7777 (talk) 09:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ecology terminology

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improvement to the grammar Brad7777 (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The category is for terminology used in ecology, not for terminology which is ecological.- choster (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Choster. Terminology used in ecology, the field, is a much more limited scope, than terminology used in relation to anything ecological. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Surely, anything related to something ecological, like for example; something related to an ecosystem - would be studied in ecology, relative to the ecosystem. Would this not then give that term related to the ecosystem an ecological flavour? Because I thought "ecological term" referred to a term from an ecological perspective. Brad7777 (talk) 08:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC) And any term from an ecological perspective is worthy to be used in ecology. Brad7777 (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply no, ecology is a science, with specific terminology. However, ecological activism is not a science, and has its own terminology. There are other subjects related to ecology which can be covered by "ecological" terminology, but which is not covered by "ecology" terminology. I'd rather think we should not expand the scope of this category to do that. A supercategory under your proposed name can be used for such a thing, without needing to expand the current scope. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 10:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biology prefixes and suffixes

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:   Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 July 19. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Improvement of grammar. Brad7777 (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biology terminology

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: An improvement to the grammar. Brad7777 (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Compensation

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 17:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Compensation has too many other meanings. This category is about Compensation methods so it should be named as such. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:108 holy temples of Vishnu

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Bushranger One ping only 17:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The 108 holy temples of Vishnu are known, collectively, as the Divya Desams. (Category creator not notified: inactive for 2 years) -- Black Falcon (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Transportation in Canada

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename all. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transportation --> Transport
Nominator's rationale: The established naming convention on the top level of the category tree is to use "Transport" instead of "Transportation". See: Category:Transport in Canada, Category:Transport in Canada by province or territory and Category:Transport in Canada by city. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 06:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename all. Canada is an on-the-fence country on this score. Transportation and transport seem to be used about equally. In that case, we should default to the majority of the world's usage, which is transport.--Mike Selinker (talk) 06:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename all to match Category:Transport in Canada and Transport in Canada. Oculi (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename all as Transport, not transportation, is the standard established by the top of the tree and per standard usage in a 'neutral' country, as per Mike and Oculi. - The Bushranger posting as Aerobird from a public computer Talk 20:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I would say the standard established by the tree is the one used by most of the tree, in this case, it is "transportation". And I don't see what a "neutral" country has to do with Canada, since this deals solely with Canadian categories. The US is a "neutral" (ie. non-Canadian) country, it uses "transportation". (I have no opinion on which side is better, but I think the opinions provided should be based on Canadian English when determining which way these categories are named) 70.49.127.65 (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's "neutral" as in "uses 'transport' and 'transportation' roughly equally in Canadian English" based on the comments above. And just because the majority of the tree uses a certain standard doesn't mean it's the right standard. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:City airports

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Inclusion criteria is too subjective. What exactly determines 'close proximity'? Why restrict the target to only business travelers? Vegaswikian (talk) 05:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_June_25&oldid=1074809274"