Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Bueno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Bueno

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor political candidate. Only held hyper-local office, and coverage is minor and generally routine. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Curbon7 (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Libertarianism, and Florida. Curbon7 (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Andre🚐 03:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NPOL and there is not enough WP:RS-compliant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the coverage includes recognized RSes such as Reason as well as Miami Tribune. Running for commissioner in FL, meets notability. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 19:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL by a mile. Simply running for office doesn't satisfy any criteria, much less the more specific NPOL, and I fail to see how she even meets GNG. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get articles just for being candidates for county commission — even if she won that election, county commission still wouldn't be an inherently notable office that guaranteed inclusion in Wikipedia, because politicians at the local level of government are not all "inherently" notable under WP:NPOL. And no, just because a bit of run of the mill campaign coverage exists in the local media, where coverage of local politics is simply expected to exist, isn't enough to make her notable for the purposes of an international encyclopedia — her coverage would have to nationalize before she had a credible claim to being more significant than most other county council candidates. Bearcat (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This page has a significant number of RSes and it appears as though this person is at least a mildly notable figure. On Wikipedia, it is our job to add and compile knowledge to make it easy for normal people to access it in a convenient way. Given the fact that this article has a lot of RSes, a significant amount of content and the individual would constitute a person that people would have interest looking up and reading more about given her extensive background and mainstream coverage, I think it would be a mistake to unnecessarily remove this page. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sources are either routine election coverage, local, or do not provide significant coverage (or all 3). Regarding your point of "it is our job to add and compile knowledge to make it easy for normal people to access it in a convenient way", I implore you to read WP:NOT; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate database of every single person who runs for every single office, nor are we a Who's Who. Curbon7 (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.