- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SPAM advertising DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 05:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No notability stated or implied, certainly nothing on Google to pass WP:CORP from the standpoint of non-trivial articles. Tychocat 07:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advert for a non-notable product. --Ezeu 23:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not only is it obscure, but it's also blatant spam. --ApolloBoy 00:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nominations. *~Daniel~* ☎ 00:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ezeu -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. TigerShark 11:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.