Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conceit (rapper) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 15:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Conceit (rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable rapper. Koala15 (talk) 02:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 7. Snotbot t • c » 03:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete considering it notable would be conceited. History2007 (talk) 19:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per the previous AfD. An article from the San Francisco Chronicle and an interview by NPR are listed in the article; though not properly cited as references, they should be enough for notability. --MelanieN (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Leaning keep per MelanieN; and no policy-based reason for deletion has been put forward here. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.