Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dauntae Mariner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dauntae Mariner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than being the nephew of Tim Cahill this guy is not notable. Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - article is supported by numerous reliable independent sources, so easily passes GNG.--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I wouldn't say multiple. Maybe one. Simione001 (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- sources include significant coverage from national newspapers, local new sources, and international websites. --Gri3720 (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per IdiotSavant and Gri3720. Besides the many already sources on the page, I also found 16. Clearly significant figure in Samoan and Australian lower league football and young player with ongoing career. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for reasons given above. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources (Samoan Observer, 442) which show notability. Giant Snowman 10:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 09:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.