[go: nahoru, domu]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Joachim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Joachim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Auction results for paintings and not much else don't add up to enough to satisfy WP:ARTIST. (From what I can see from other, non-paywalled sources, his works sell in the range of hundreds of dollars only.) Clarityfiend (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I am not finding any reliable sourcing on this artist. All the listed sources are auction results which does not count towards notability. Joachim does not have significant coverage, nor has his work been part of major exhibition, and I cannot find evidence that his work is part a notable collection. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.