Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of video game companies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- History of video game companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is not a "history of video game companies". It is a list of six video game publishers, along with some developers they have worked with and/or acquired. It is not, and cannot be, comprehensive. There are already other Wikipedia lists of video game publishers and companies. This is not a history article, and it cannot ever be a "history of video game companies" - what companies would it be? All of them? Tempshill (talk) 21:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant, esp. given History of video games. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redundant to List of video game companies and History of video games, and largely unsourced too. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is not a history article, it's a half-fast spinout of the list articles as mentioned above. History articles need stuff like prose and summary style; this page has neither. MuZemike 19:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even on the history of video game companies and, as said before, redundant. --YOWUZA Talk 2 me! 11:44, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is no history there and you would have to make a list of every video game company there ever was to make such a history and would be far to big for an "Encyclopedia" or it would be an encyclopedia in its own right --Rageypeep (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.