- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Jeremy Gavron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded after the addition of several sources. However, all the sourcing revolves around his book about his mother's suicide. The book might be notable, but I don't think this person meets either WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Onel5969 TT me 17:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The news coverage is partly about him and partly about the book so there is some interest in him as a person. He has also written other books although clearly there is just the one thing he is mainly notable for. I think he probably just about scrapes over the line for notability. The article could do with a little expansion but not too much. If this were to grow into a big article that would be undue. If the consensus is not to keep then maybe this could be renamed and redrafted as a stub about the book. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as not quite what we need independent notability, a book article can be explored if needed. SwisterTwister talk 22:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.