Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe the Cameraman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Scott Muller (cricketer) per the consensus that the existing content is better than the article, but history is under the redirect should someone ID something that needs merging. Star Mississippi 01:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe the Cameraman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Joe the Cameraman is known for just one unremarkable news event. Desertarun (talk) 13:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Barely any notability and the page name sounds like it's from a cartoon. Zippybonzo (talk) 14:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Scott Muller (cricketer). There are enough sources, but this person is notable only for a single event (WP:1E), so does not deserve an article. However, please remember to fully merge all the information and sources to prevent loss of information. Toadspike (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There is already a big paragraph in the Scott Muller article recording the event. That paragraph is much better written than the Joe the cameraman article and doesn't need extraneous and irrelevant detail added. Desertarun (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Scott Muller (cricketer) per Toadspike. There is enough information to sustain information in Wikipedia, so the base article should not be deleted. Deus et lex (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Gets a few views, but not really relevant to anyone besides Muller. No need for merge as already adequately covered there. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.