Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifehouse International Church Yokohama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lifehouse International Church. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lifehouse International Church Yokohama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ad for a non-notable church. Several previous nominations for speedy deletion and proposed deletion opposed by the main author, who also appears to be the pastor of the church. Tal 12:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Lifehouse International Church. insufficient separate notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge (merge if any sourced content worthwhile adding to the relevant main article's subsection). Individual congregations are rarely notable, I even have difficulty finding much information in English on the organization itself, actually... —Paleo Neonate – 15:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (briefly) or just redirect -- Even as a church of 500, it is still only a local church, which need something special about them to qualify as notable; I see little to do so here. I would love to be able to have an article on every local church, but that would need a change in WP policy. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.