[go: nahoru, domu]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game franchises with baseball bats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It's obviously snowing. No need to draw this out and waste editors' time. Randykitty (talk) 23:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of video game franchises with baseball bats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely nonsensical list, it would make as much sense to have a list of books that mention water or list of movies that show a car. While maybe a list of video games about baseball might be defensible (although questionable), this is completely useless. AryKun (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - completely non-notable and nonsensical cross-section of traits. I have no idea why it would be of interest to read or even write such an article. Sergecross73 msg me 13:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The list's definition makes it two unrelated lists combined: a list of games using baseball bats as weapons, and a list of games using baseball bats to play baseball (or something similar). That means it's useless both to a hypothetical reader who is interested in misappropriation of sports items for violence, and a hypothetical reader interested in games about baseball. And both of these hypothetical readers will probably do better to use Google anyway. Elemimele (talk) 13:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is very surprising that this got approved through AfC by User:AssumeGoodWraith given that it is a textbook indiscriminate list without any sourcing whatsoever, it casts doubt on their reviewing ability if they seriously thought that was a good idea. Suffice it to say that even if it was sourced and fully expanded, it would remain too trivial to merit a list (or category, for that matter), just as a hypothetical list of games containing chainsaws or water guns would be. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Gotta be honest, didn't review this thoroughly enough. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 14:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete I had to do a double take to make sure I wasn't imagining the article existed. This should be a SNOW delete. Spf121188 (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. Why did I think this was a good idea. Mobius Gerig (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.