Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senate Document No. 43
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. ugen64 03:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reference to this document in any government website, only on anti-Bush blogs. --Kainaw (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If User:NarrowPathPilgrim or somebody doesn't come up with some verifiable documentation or evidence on this pretty quick, then I'd say it's speedy delete. AnonMoos 01:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, unverifiable, more than likely a hoax. Possible G1. This user has a history of making controversial edits and violating WP:POINT, as well. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V and possibly WP:HOAX--TBCTaLk?!? 04:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — The original user (NarrowPathPilgrim) has almost exclusively edited Federal Governmental articles and always from a strong consipracy theorist/tax protestor PoV, see for example their edits to Talk:Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and The Law that Never Was. Also, based on the edit to driver's licence, I wonder if they're a Zephram Stark sockpuppet. 68.39.174.238 06:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: if this document is referenced by a lot of conspiracy theorists etc., then it might conceivably be notable even if it isn't real. I'd want to see some solid, reliable references to prove that before I'd consider voting to keep, though. Non-notable conspiracy theories and hoaxes don't belong here. — Haeleth Talk 13:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: looks like hoax, also WP:NN, and WP:V; reminds me of infowars.com/alex jones! Zos 19:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. --Tachyon01 23:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete consipracy nonsense. Gamaliel 04:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - was that the command to kill the Jedi? -- RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 04:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.