Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wakayama Telecasting Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wakayama Telecasting Corporation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Current sources are enough to support the article. More than 3 independent sources (Nikkei, Inc., Chiba TV, MIC, JBA, Good Design Award), and covered the contents mentioned in the article. Onel5969 can't provide any evidence to support that current sources are not in-depth coverage. Onel5969 often deleted or merged articles that were sufficiently sourced and without any discussion. This behavior is not constructive, and very harmful to the collaborative culture of Wikipedia.--Suicasmo (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being the only commercial television station in a prefecture is sufficiently important for the article to remain. Bensci54 (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Well sourced and any TV channel is really going to be notable. There will be no information found in the English world on this, so you'd have to search in Japanese and have some understanding of it. The article also has 3 other pages listed, so we know it's notable.KatoKungLee (talk) 03:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.