Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gettysburg Cyclorama/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Numerous uncited passages (including a section with an orange "citations needed" banner since 2019) and a lede that is too short to summarise all important aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this. Hog Farm Talk 19:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed the "Benedit Buckeye" section as unsourced and undue detail. If I can get ahold of "The Gettysburg Cyclorama: The Turning Point of the Civil War on Canvas." the rest of this should be doable (it definitely needs further work), if I can't, I'll probably need to let this one go. Hog Farm Talk 01:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I think I could get this back to GA level. What is your expected timeline? I've done some preliminary work on the 10th CAB article, but currently am on a work trip so can't do anything more on both articles till the 23rd. Is that alright? Matarisvan (talk) 11:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Matarisvan: - I'm in process of this (I should be able to access the necessary book now). Do you have any objections if I try to take care of this myself, since I was involved at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of Gettysburg/1 as well? Hog Farm Talk 23:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have any objections. Looking forward to your rewrite of this article. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 02:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Matarisvan: - I'm in process of this (I should be able to access the necessary book now). Do you have any objections if I try to take care of this myself, since I was involved at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of Gettysburg/1 as well? Hog Farm Talk 23:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I think I could get this back to GA level. What is your expected timeline? I've done some preliminary work on the 10th CAB article, but currently am on a work trip so can't do anything more on both articles till the 23rd. Is that alright? Matarisvan (talk) 11:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm still intending to work on this - I've had to take a pause due to internet issues and real-life business, but hopefully I can resume work this weekend. Hog Farm Talk 02:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- The last of the uncited content is done. I still need to redo the lead and do some source-text integrity checking. Hog Farm Talk 22:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: - I've spot-checked the sources I could access (which, significantly, does not include several paywalled sources and the Thomas 2005 book) and have redone the lead. This isn't perfect, but I think this is ready for re-review. Hog Farm Talk 01:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Keep. I think the lede could be expanded upon, but other then that I have no major concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had some trouble writing the lead on this one. Maybe the article writing muse will return after some more sweet tea. Hog Farm Talk 01:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Keep. I think the lede could be expanded upon, but other then that I have no major concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: - I've spot-checked the sources I could access (which, significantly, does not include several paywalled sources and the Thomas 2005 book) and have redone the lead. This isn't perfect, but I think this is ready for re-review. Hog Farm Talk 01:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.