Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of municipalities in the San Francisco Bay Area/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:14, 21 August 2011 [1].

List of municipalities in the San Francisco Bay Area

Nominator(s): Kurykh (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The San Francisco Bay Area has its share of FLs, most of them station lists. Here is yet another list that I believe meets the criteria. --Kurykh (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first FLC review, so with that caveat, to me this looks very nice. The only thing I notice is that in ref 3, it says "p. 273, 462." but it should say "pp. 273, 462." (pp for plural) as there is more than one page listed. Consider this a support when that's fixed. PumpkinSky talk 22:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 06:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does the list include all the census-designated places in the Bay Area?—Chris!_c/t 00:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It used to. I took that section out because I thought keeping this list in line with similar ones (which include only municipalities) would make it more useful. Keeping the section would lengthen the article and the title into some unwieldy mess, but adding it back (and subsequently renaming the list) is only a few revisions away. --Kurykh (talk) 06:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it is fine to leave them out then.—Chris!_c/t 04:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Figures in the lead are a little too precise for me. Perhaps "over 7.1 million" and "around 6,900 square miles" or similar? I hate all that last digit "accuracy".
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is [1] really needed when you have [2] in place there?
- Removed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The region is anchored by" what does that actually mean?
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
" Spanish first arrived in the Bay Area in 1769" - repeat of "the Bay Area" in the same sentence, consider a re-word.
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think we need to link United States...
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
" and forms the 53rd largest urban area in the world." reference please.
- Removed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"numerous census-designated places." - perhaps "numerous other..." as the previous examples were all census-designated, right?
- Census-designated places are creations of the U.S. Census Bureau. Cities and counties are state entities. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
" while the most recent one was" no need for "one". Nor the "which" after it.
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image captions are all weak, tell me what I'm looking at!!
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 2, ref 8 needs an en-dash or three.
- Fixed. --Kurykh (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.