Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]]) ~~~~~ I'll take this one. I need more points for the wikicup and also it would benefit my WikiProject and a frequent collaborator. ~~~~ <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, an...' |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8:
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review – see [[WP:WIAGA]] for criteria'''
#Is it '''well written'''?
#:A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:B. It complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|manual of style]] guidelines for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead sections]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|words to watch]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|list incorporation]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Is it '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''' with '''no original research''', as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]?
#:A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with [[WP:FNNR|the layout style guideline]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:B. [[WP:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]] are [[WP:Inline citation|cited inline]]. All content that [[Wikipedia:Content that could reasonably be challenged|could reasonably be challenged]], except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:C. It contains [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:D. It contains no [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright violations]] nor [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
#:A. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects]] of the topic: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:B. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style]]): {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
#:It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Is it '''stable'''?
#: It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] or content dispute: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Is it illustrated, if possible, by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]'''?
#:A. Images are [[Wikipedia:Copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid non-free use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#:B. Images are [[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:Captions|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|}}
#::
| |||